Re: NPTL docs inquiry

2017-08-11 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
On 08/11/2017 10:11 AM, Yubin Ruan wrote: > 2017-08-09 3:27 GMT+08:00 Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) > : >> >> Hi, >> >> On 08/07/2017 06:42 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> On 08/07/2017 09:31 AM, Yubin Ruan wrote: Hi, I am wondering whether there is any progress for NPTL. In page[1] I see lots

Re: NPTL docs inquiry

2017-08-11 Thread Yubin Ruan
2017-08-09 3:27 GMT+08:00 Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) : > > Hi, > > On 08/07/2017 06:42 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 08/07/2017 09:31 AM, Yubin Ruan wrote: > >> Hi, I am wondering whether there is any progress for NPTL. In page[1] > >> I see lots of pthread-related pages are missing. Pretty shock

Re: NPTL docs inquiry

2017-08-08 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hi, On 08/07/2017 06:42 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 08/07/2017 09:31 AM, Yubin Ruan wrote: >> Hi, I am wondering whether there is any progress for NPTL. In page[1] >> I see lots of pthread-related pages are missing. Pretty shocked by >> that. >> >> Are there any plan for that? Who is the maintain

Re: NPTL docs inquiry

2017-08-07 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 08/07/2017 09:31 AM, Yubin Ruan wrote: > Hi, I am wondering whether there is any progress for NPTL. In page[1] > I see lots of pthread-related pages are missing. Pretty shocked by > that. > > Are there any plan for that? Who is the maintainer of NPTL? Why are > such an important lib missing man

NPTL docs inquiry

2017-08-07 Thread Yubin Ruan
Hi, I am wondering whether there is any progress for NPTL. In page[1] I see lots of pthread-related pages are missing. Pretty shocked by that. Are there any plan for that? Who is the maintainer of NPTL? Why are such an important lib missing manual pages? [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/