Re: [v3] pstore-ram: add Device Tree bindings

2016-03-14 Thread Brian Norris
Hi Greg, On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:40:56PM -0800, Greg Hackmann wrote: > ramoops is one of the remaining places where ARM vendors still rely on > board-specific shims. Device Tree lets us replace those shims with > generic code. > > These bindings mirror the ramoops module parameters, with two

Re: [PATCH v3] pstore-ram: add Device Tree bindings

2016-03-03 Thread Olof Johansson
Hi, On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Greg Hackmann wrote: > ramoops is one of the remaining places where ARM vendors still rely on > board-specific shims. Device Tree lets us replace those shims with > generic code. > > These bindings mirror the ramoops module parameters, with two small > differe

Re: [PATCH v3] pstore-ram: add Device Tree bindings

2016-01-27 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:44 AM, Markus Pargmann wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for the late response. > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:40:56PM -0800, Greg Hackmann wrote: >> ramoops is one of the remaining places where ARM vendors still rely on >> board-specific shims. Device Tree lets us replace those sh

Re: [PATCH v3] pstore-ram: add Device Tree bindings

2016-01-27 Thread Markus Pargmann
Hi, sorry for the late response. On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:40:56PM -0800, Greg Hackmann wrote: > ramoops is one of the remaining places where ARM vendors still rely on > board-specific shims. Device Tree lets us replace those shims with > generic code. > > These bindings mirror the ramoops mod