On 22/11/24 04:53, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 04:34:51PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> +config RCU_DYNTICKS_TORTURE
>> +bool "Minimize RCU dynticks counter size"
>> +depends on RCU_EXPERT
>> +default n
>> +help
>> + This option controls the width of
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 04:34:51PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> A later commit will reduce the size of the RCU watching counter to free up
> some bits for another purpose. Paul suggested adding a config option to
> test the extreme case where the counter is reduced to its minimum usable
> wid
On 20/11/24 15:50, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 04:34:51PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> A later commit will reduce the size of the RCU watching counter to free up
>> some bits for another purpose. Paul suggested adding a config option to
>> test the extreme case where the
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 04:34:51PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> A later commit will reduce the size of the RCU watching counter to free up
> some bits for another purpose. Paul suggested adding a config option to
> test the extreme case where the counter is reduced to its minimum usable
> wid
A later commit will reduce the size of the RCU watching counter to free up
some bits for another purpose. Paul suggested adding a config option to
test the extreme case where the counter is reduced to its minimum usable
width for rcutorture to poke at, so do that.
Make it only configurable under R