v3->v4:
- Drop patch 4 as it is just a minor optimization.
- Add a cc:stable tag to patch 1.
- Clean up some comments in patch 3.
v2->v3:
- With confirmation that the dummy array in dentry_stat structure
was never a replacement of a previously used field, patch 3 is now
reverted
On 01/30/2019 01:35 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 8:40 AM Waiman Long wrote:
>> Ping. Will this patch be picked up?
> Can you re-send the patch-set and I'll just apply it directly since it
> seems to be languishing otherwise.
>
> Linus
Sure.
Thanks for your
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 8:40 AM Waiman Long wrote:
>
> Ping. Will this patch be picked up?
Can you re-send the patch-set and I'll just apply it directly since it
seems to be languishing otherwise.
Linus
On 01/15/2019 04:27 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 12/16/2018 02:37 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 1:53 PM Waiman Long wrote:
>>> This patchset addresses 2 issues found in the dentry code and adds a
>>> new nr_dentry_negative per-cpu counter to track the total number of
>>> nega
On 12/16/2018 02:37 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 1:53 PM Waiman Long wrote:
>> This patchset addresses 2 issues found in the dentry code and adds a
>> new nr_dentry_negative per-cpu counter to track the total number of
>> negative dentries in all the LRU lists.
> The series
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 1:53 PM Waiman Long wrote:
>
> This patchset addresses 2 issues found in the dentry code and adds a
> new nr_dentry_negative per-cpu counter to track the total number of
> negative dentries in all the LRU lists.
The series looks sane to me. I'm assuming I'll get it either
v3->v4:
- Drop patch 4 as it is just a minor optimization.
- Add a cc:stable tag to patch 1.
- Clean up some comments in patch 3.
v2->v3:
- With confirmation that the dummy array in dentry_stat structure
was never a replacement of a previously used field, patch 3 is now
reverted
