>
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:27:38PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > I value your opinion but I'm not responsible for inventing RPMB
> > and/or its implementation storage devices (eMMC, UFC, NVMe), it's pretty
> much done deal out there in the wild.
> > I'm just trying to provide common API a
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:27:38PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> I value your opinion but I'm not responsible for inventing RPMB
> and/or its implementation storage devices (eMMC, UFC, NVMe), it's pretty
> much done deal out there in the wild.
> I'm just trying to provide common API above it.
>
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:53:12PM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > Register UFS RPMB LUN with the RPMB subsystem and provide
> > implementation for the RPMB access operations. RPMB partition is
> > accessed via a sequence of security protocol in and security protocol
> > out commands with UFS
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:53:12PM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> Register UFS RPMB LUN with the RPMB subsystem and provide
> implementation for the RPMB access operations. RPMB partition is
> accessed via a sequence of security protocol in and security protocol
> out commands with UFS specific para
Register UFS RPMB LUN with the RPMB subsystem and provide
implementation for the RPMB access operations. RPMB partition is
accessed via a sequence of security protocol in and security protocol
out commands with UFS specific parameters. This multi step process is
abstracted into 4 basic RPMB command
