On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:57:54PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:31:50AM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:29:29AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 09:22:16AM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:31:50AM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:29:29AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 09:22:16AM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:38:19PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:29:29AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 09:22:16AM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:38:19PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:38:23PM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 09:22:16AM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:38:19PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:38:23PM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:31:26PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> >
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:38:19PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:38:23PM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:31:26PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 10/11/19 4:10 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > > Hey Hans, thanks for
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:38:23PM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:31:26PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 10/11/19 4:10 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > Hey Hans, thanks for staying on top of this and follow up! For some
> > > reason the universe conspi
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:31:26PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/11/19 4:10 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > Hey Hans, thanks for staying on top of this and follow up! For some
> > reason the universe conspired against your first and last patch ([1/8],
> > [8/8]), and I never got them
Hi,
On 10/11/19 4:10 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
Hey Hans, thanks for staying on top of this and follow up! For some
reason the universe conspired against your first and last patch ([1/8],
[8/8]), and I never got them. Could you bounce these or resend in case
others confirm they also didn't get
Hey Hans, thanks for staying on top of this and follow up! For some
reason the universe conspired against your first and last patch ([1/8],
[8/8]), and I never got them. Could you bounce these or resend in case
others confirm they also didn't get it?
While at it, can you Cc scott.bran...@broadcom.
* Hans de Goede wrote:
> > So I was looking for a high level 0/ boilerplate description of this
> > series, to explain what "EFI embedded fw" is, what problems it solves and
> > how it helps the kernel in general - and found this in 2/8:
>
> Sorry you had to dig into the individual patch chang
Hi Ingo,
On 07-10-2019 16:19, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
Here is v7 of my patch-set to add support for EFI embedded fw to the kernel.
v6 was posted a long time ago, around the 4.18 days. The long wait was for
a suitable secure-hash for checking the firmware we find e
* Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Here is v7 of my patch-set to add support for EFI embedded fw to the kernel.
>
> v6 was posted a long time ago, around the 4.18 days. The long wait was for
> a suitable secure-hash for checking the firmware we find embedded in the EFI
> is the one we expec
Hi All,
Here is v7 of my patch-set to add support for EFI embedded fw to the kernel.
v6 was posted a long time ago, around the 4.18 days. The long wait was for
a suitable secure-hash for checking the firmware we find embedded in the EFI
is the one we expect.
With 5.4-rc1 we finally have a standa
13 matches
Mail list logo
