Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] KVM: arm64: Document PV-time interface

2019-10-21 Thread Mark Rutland
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 02:40:31PM +0100, Steven Price wrote: > On 18/10/2019 18:10, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 06:56:51PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > [...] > >>> +PV_TIME_ST > >>> += == > >>> +Function ID: (uint32)0xC521 > >>>

Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] KVM: arm64: Document PV-time interface

2019-10-21 Thread Steven Price
On 18/10/2019 18:10, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 06:56:51PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: [...] >>> +PV_TIME_ST >>> += == >>> +Function ID: (uint32)0xC521 >>> +Return value: (int64) IPA of the stolen time data structure for >>

Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] KVM: arm64: Document PV-time interface

2019-10-18 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 06:56:51PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi Steven, > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 01:59:21PM +0100, Steven Price wrote: > > Introduce a paravirtualization interface for KVM/arm64 based on the > > "Arm Paravirtualized Time for Arm-Base Systems" specification DEN 0057A. > > I n

Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] KVM: arm64: Document PV-time interface

2019-10-17 Thread Steven Price
On 15/10/2019 18:56, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi Steven, > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 01:59:21PM +0100, Steven Price wrote: >> Introduce a paravirtualization interface for KVM/arm64 based on the >> "Arm Paravirtualized Time for Arm-Base Systems" specification DEN 0057A. > > I notice that as published

Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] KVM: arm64: Document PV-time interface

2019-10-15 Thread Mark Rutland
Hi Steven, On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 01:59:21PM +0100, Steven Price wrote: > Introduce a paravirtualization interface for KVM/arm64 based on the > "Arm Paravirtualized Time for Arm-Base Systems" specification DEN 0057A. I notice that as published, this is a BETA Draft, with the explicit note: | Th