On 06/14/2016 08:50 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:46:26AM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>> On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> This is a re
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:46:26AM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> >>> This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has
On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>>> This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero
>>> response since then. Already have one ACK from Lore
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> > This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero
> > response since then. Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an
> > arm64 maintainer woul
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero
> response since then. Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an
> arm64 maintainer would be really helpful.
I thought there were outstanding comments on v4
This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero
response since then. Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an
arm64 maintainer would be really helpful.
The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
2016, but the arm64 kernel documentatio
On 05/17/2016 10:30 AM, Al Stone wrote:
> On 05/16/2016 05:44 PM, Alexey Klimov wrote:
>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 09:19 PM, Al Stone wrote:
>>> On 04/25/2016 03:21 PM, Al Stone wrote:
The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
2016, but the arm64 kernel document
On 05/16/2016 05:44 PM, Alexey Klimov wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 09:19 PM, Al Stone wrote:
>> On 04/25/2016 03:21 PM, Al Stone wrote:
>>> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
>>> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
>>> for
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 09:19 PM, Al Stone wrote:
> On 04/25/2016 03:21 PM, Al Stone wrote:
> > The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
> > 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
> > for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were signifi
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Al Stone wrote:
> On 04/25/2016 03:21 PM, Al Stone wrote:
>> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
>> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
>> for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significan
On 04/25/2016 03:21 PM, Al Stone wrote:
> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
> for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significant additions to the
> spec that had not yet been mentio
The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significant additions to the
spec that had not yet been mentioned -- for example, the 6.0 mechanisms
added to
12 matches
Mail list logo
