Sorry, fell behind on things again...
Thorsten Leemhuis writes:
>> - It would be awfully nice if we could provide this advice in exactly
>> one place in the document. This is one of our most important docs,
>> and it is far too long to expect new contributors to read through and
>> absorb
On 10.02.25 19:12, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis writes:
>> Point out that explicit permission is usually needed to tag other people
>> in changes, but mention that implicit permission can be sufficient in
>> certain cases. This fixes slight inconsistencies between Reported-by:
>> and
On 10.02.25 17:16, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:24:56 +0100
> Thorsten Leemhuis escreveu:
>
>> On 07.02.25 02:42, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:30:10PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
b/Doc
On 10.02.25 12:15, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 04:36:47PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 07.02.25 10:05, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:30:10PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> [...]
+Be careful in the addition of the aforementioned tags
Thorsten Leemhuis writes:
> Point out that explicit permission is usually needed to tag other people
> in changes, but mention that implicit permission can be sufficient in
> certain cases. This fixes slight inconsistencies between Reported-by:
> and Suggested-by: and makes the usage more intuiti
Em Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:24:56 +0100
Thorsten Leemhuis escreveu:
> On 07.02.25 02:42, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:30:10PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
> >> b/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
> >> index dbb763a8de9
On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 04:36:47PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 07.02.25 10:05, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Thank you for the patch.
>
> Thx for saying that!
>
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:30:10PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >> Point out that explicit permission is usually needed
On 07.02.25 10:05, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Thank you for the patch.
Thx for saying that!
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:30:10PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Point out that explicit permission is usually needed to tag other people
>> in changes, but mention that implicit permission can be su
Hi Thorsten,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:30:10PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Point out that explicit permission is usually needed to tag other people
> in changes, but mention that implicit permission can be sufficient in
> certain cases. This fixes slight inconsiste
On 07.02.25 02:42, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:30:10PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> diff --git a/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
>> b/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
>> index dbb763a8de901d..22fa925353cf54 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
>> +
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:30:10PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
> b/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
> index dbb763a8de901d..22fa925353cf54 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
> @@ -
Point out that explicit permission is usually needed to tag other people
in changes, but mention that implicit permission can be sufficient in
certain cases. This fixes slight inconsistencies between Reported-by:
and Suggested-by: and makes the usage more intuitive.
While at it, explicitly mention
12 matches
Mail list logo
