On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 07:58:04PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>
> > On 10/8/19 9:11 AM, Nick Hu wrote:
> > > Skip the memmove checking for those archs who don't support it.
> >
> > The patch is fine but the changelog sounds misleading. We don't skip
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> On 10/8/19 9:11 AM, Nick Hu wrote:
> > Skip the memmove checking for those archs who don't support it.
>
> The patch is fine but the changelog sounds misleading. We don't skip memmove
> checking.
> If arch don't have memmove than the C implementatio
On 10/8/19 9:11 AM, Nick Hu wrote:
> Skip the memmove checking for those archs who don't support it.
The patch is fine but the changelog sounds misleading. We don't skip memmove
checking.
If arch don't have memmove than the C implementation from lib/string.c used.
It's instrumented by compile
On Mon, 07 Oct 2019 23:11:51 PDT (-0700), nic...@andestech.com wrote:
Skip the memmove checking for those archs who don't support it.
Signed-off-by: Nick Hu
---
mm/kasan/common.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/kasan/common.c b/mm/kasan/common.c
index 6814d6d6a023..897
Skip the memmove checking for those archs who don't support it.
Signed-off-by: Nick Hu
---
mm/kasan/common.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/kasan/common.c b/mm/kasan/common.c
index 6814d6d6a023..897f9520bab3 100644
--- a/mm/kasan/common.c
+++ b/mm/kasan/common.c
@@ -107
