Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] PM / core: Add SMART_SUSPEND driver flag

2017-11-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 28 October 2017 at 00:22, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki >> >> Define and document a SMART_SUSPEND flag to instruct bus types and PM >> domains that the system suspend callbacks provided by the driver can >> cope with r

Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] PM / core: Add SMART_SUSPEND driver flag

2017-11-06 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 28 October 2017 at 00:22, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Define and document a SMART_SUSPEND flag to instruct bus types and PM > domains that the system suspend callbacks provided by the driver can > cope with runtime-suspended devices, so from the driver's perspective

[PATCH v2 3/6] PM / core: Add SMART_SUSPEND driver flag

2017-10-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki Define and document a SMART_SUSPEND flag to instruct bus types and PM domains that the system suspend callbacks provided by the driver can cope with runtime-suspended devices, so from the driver's perspective it should be safe to leave devices in runtime suspend during sys