On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 02:55:49 -0700
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > OK, I've had a long conversation with the LF lawyer, and she said clearly
> > that we really should not be introducing CC-SA material into the kernel
> > source tree. It's a pain; I really do like CC-SA better for
> > documentation,
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 11:27:35AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 10:51:54 +1000
> Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> > Can you let us know whether the CC-by-SA 4.0 license is acceptible
> > or not? That's really the only thing that we need clarified at this
> > point - if it's OK I'll t
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 11:27:35AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 10:51:54 +1000 Dave Chinner
> wrote:
>
> > Can you let us know whether the CC-by-SA 4.0 license is
> > acceptible or not? That's really the only thing that we need
> > clarified at this point - if it's OK I'll t
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 10:51:54 +1000
Dave Chinner wrote:
> Can you let us know whether the CC-by-SA 4.0 license is acceptible
> or not? That's really the only thing that we need clarified at this
> point - if it's OK I'll to pull this into the XFS tree for the 4.20
> merge window. If not, we'll go b
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 06:29:51 -0700
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I had an informal chat with Bradley Kuhn at LinuxCon Japan about using
> CC-BY-SA-4.0 and he indicated that I was probably better off using the
> GPL-2(+) for documentation. I've changed the XArray documentation from
> CC-BY-SA-4.0 to GPL
On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 10:51:54AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 09:18:11PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This series converts the existing in-kernel xfs documentation to rst
> > format, links it in with the rest of the kernel's rst documetation, and
> >
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 07:01:20PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 10:51:54 +1000
> Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> > Can you let us know whether the CC-by-SA 4.0 license is acceptible
> > or not? That's really the only thing that we need clarified at this
> > point - if it's OK I'll t
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 10:51:54 +1000
Dave Chinner wrote:
> Can you let us know whether the CC-by-SA 4.0 license is acceptible
> or not? That's really the only thing that we need clarified at this
> point - if it's OK I'll to pull this into the XFS tree for the 4.20
> merge window. If not, we'll go b
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 09:18:11PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This series converts the existing in-kernel xfs documentation to rst
> format, links it in with the rest of the kernel's rst documetation, and
> then begins pulling in the contents of the Data Structures & Algorithms
>
Hi all,
This series converts the existing in-kernel xfs documentation to rst
format, links it in with the rest of the kernel's rst documetation, and
then begins pulling in the contents of the Data Structures & Algorithms
book from the xfs-documentation git tree. No changes are made to the
text du
Hi all,
This series converts the existing in-kernel xfs documentation to rst
format, links it in with the rest of the kernel's rst documetation, and
then begins pulling in the contents of the Data Structures & Algorithms
book from the xfs-documentation git tree. No changes are made to the
text du
11 matches
Mail list logo
