On 09/12/2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Yeah, what I'm saying is that maybe we need to extend generic power
> supply driver.
I don't know about that, you would have to ask the maintainers if that
is appropriate.
Thanks for the time!
Ognjen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscrib
On Sat 2017-12-09 11:29:51, Ognjen Galić wrote:
> On 09/12/2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > In newer series (I can't find it at the moment, sorry)
>
> The new series is a 3-patch patchset that obsoletes this
> patch. It is in the testing stage and will be pushed to
> the mailing lists and maintainer
On 09/12/2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> In newer series (I can't find it at the moment, sorry)
The new series is a 3-patch patchset that obsoletes this
patch. It is in the testing stage and will be pushed to
the mailing lists and maintainers in a few days.
> Maybe we should have separate status "no
Hi!
In newer series (I can't find it at the moment, sorry) you return
"NOT_CHARGING" status when not charging because of wear control.
Maybe we should have separate status "not charging due to wear
control"?
Thanks,
Pavel
-
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:53:32PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Not really.
>
> This is generic code, so no thinkpad_acpi-specific stuff in this file, please,
> even under #ifdefs.
>
I have some ideas, and I want your confirmation if that would be
acceptable.
Can I do this:
Expose a new
