Re: [PATCH security-next v3 10/29] LSM: Don't ignore initialization failures

2018-10-01 Thread John Johansen
On 09/24/2018 05:18 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > LSM initialization failures have traditionally been ignored. We should > at least WARN when something goes wrong. > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook about time Reviewed-by: John Johansen > --- > security/security.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions

[PATCH security-next v3 10/29] LSM: Don't ignore initialization failures

2018-09-24 Thread Kees Cook
LSM initialization failures have traditionally been ignored. We should at least WARN when something goes wrong. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook --- security/security.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index ee49b921d750..1f