Re: [PATCH security-next v3 01/29] LSM: Correctly announce start of LSM initialization

On 09/24/2018 05:18 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > For a while now, the LSM core has said it was "initializED", rather than > "initializING". This adjust the report to be more accurate (i.e. before > this was reported before any LSMs had been initialized.) > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > Reviewed-by: Case

Re: [PATCH security-next v3 01/29] LSM: Correctly announce start of LSM initialization

On Mon, 24 Sep 2018, Kees Cook wrote: > For a while now, the LSM core has said it was "initializED", rather than > "initializING". This adjust the report to be more accurate (i.e. before > this was reported before any LSMs had been initialized.) > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > Reviewed-by: Casey

[PATCH security-next v3 01/29] LSM: Correctly announce start of LSM initialization

For a while now, the LSM core has said it was "initializED", rather than "initializING". This adjust the report to be more accurate (i.e. before this was reported before any LSMs had been initialized.) Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler --- security/security.c | 3 ++- 1 file