> Il giorno 2 gen 2019, alle ore 17:03, Tejun Heo ha scritto:
>
> Hello, Paolo.
>
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 11:25:25AM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> What's the benefit of throwing away months of work, on which we agreed
>> before starting it, and that solves a problem already acknowledged by
Hello, Paolo.
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 11:25:25AM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
> What's the benefit of throwing away months of work, on which we agreed
> before starting it, and that solves a problem already acknowledged by
> interested parties?
Showing multiple conflicting numbers definitely isn't
> Il giorno 28 dic 2018, alle ore 00:41, Tejun Heo ha scritto:
>
> Hello, Paolo.
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 12:00:14PM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> 4.21 is coming ... and the legacy proportional share interface will
>> be gone with cfq. This will break legacy code using the
>> proportion
Hello, Paolo.
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 12:00:14PM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
> 4.21 is coming ... and the legacy proportional share interface will
> be gone with cfq. This will break legacy code using the
> proportional-share interface on top of bfq. This code may just fail
> when trying to use
> Il giorno 18 dic 2018, alle ore 18:22, Paolo Valente
> ha scritto:
>
>
>
>> Il giorno 18 dic 2018, alle ore 17:41, Tejun Heo ha
>> scritto:
>>
>> Hello, Paolo.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 08:48:10AM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>> If Tejun cannot see any solution to his concern, the
> Il giorno 18 dic 2018, alle ore 18:22, Paolo Valente
> ha scritto:
>
>
>
>> Il giorno 18 dic 2018, alle ore 17:41, Tejun Heo ha
>> scritto:
>>
>> Hello, Paolo.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 08:48:10AM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>> If Tejun cannot see any solution to his concern, the
> Il giorno 18 dic 2018, alle ore 17:41, Tejun Heo ha scritto:
>
> Hello, Paolo.
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 08:48:10AM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> If Tejun cannot see any solution to his concern, then can we just
>> switch to this extension, considering that
>> - for non-shared names the
Hello, Paolo.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 08:48:10AM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
> If Tejun cannot see any solution to his concern, then can we just
> switch to this extension, considering that
> - for non-shared names the interface is *identical* to the current
> one;
> - by using this new interfac
[RESENDING BECAUSE BOUNCED]
> Il giorno 10 dic 2018, alle ore 14:45, Angelo Ruocco
> ha scritto:
>
> 2018-11-30 19:53 GMT+01:00, Paolo Valente :
>>
>>
>>> Il giorno 30 nov 2018, alle ore 19:42, Tejun Heo ha
>>> scritto:
>>>
>>> Hello, Paolo.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:23:24PM +0100
2018-11-30 19:53 GMT+01:00, Paolo Valente :
>
>
>> Il giorno 30 nov 2018, alle ore 19:42, Tejun Heo ha
>> scritto:
>>
>> Hello, Paolo.
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:23:24PM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
Then we understood that exactly the same happens with throttling, in
case the latter
> Il giorno 30 nov 2018, alle ore 19:42, Tejun Heo ha scritto:
>
> Hello, Paolo.
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:23:24PM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>> Then we understood that exactly the same happens with throttling, in
>>> case the latter is activated on different devices w.r.t. bfq.
>>>
>
Hello, Paolo.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:23:24PM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
> > Then we understood that exactly the same happens with throttling, in
> > case the latter is activated on different devices w.r.t. bfq.
> >
> > In addition, the same may happen, in the near future, with the
> > bandwi
> Il giorno 20 nov 2018, alle ore 17:50, Paolo Valente
> ha scritto:
>
>
>
>> Il giorno 20 nov 2018, alle ore 17:28, Tejun Heo ha
>> scritto:
>>
>> Hello, Paolo.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:34:14AM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>> - if all entities produce the same output, the this
> Il giorno 20 nov 2018, alle ore 17:28, Tejun Heo ha scritto:
>
> Hello, Paolo.
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:34:14AM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> - if all entities produce the same output, the this common output is
>> shown only once;
>> - if the outputs differ, then every per-entity out
Hello, Paolo.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:34:14AM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
> - if all entities produce the same output, the this common output is
> shown only once;
> - if the outputs differ, then every per-entity output is shown,
> followed by the name of the entity that produced that output.
Hi,
here is the V2 of this patch series. Let me rephrase the description
of the series, in view of the fact that CFQ will be gone with legacy
block.
The current implementation of cgroups doesn't allow two or more
entities, e.g., I/O schedulers, to share the same files. Thus, to
enable people to s
16 matches
Mail list logo
