Re: [PATCH 2/4] rpmsg: drop owner assignment from spi_drivers

2016-05-04 Thread Andrew F. Davis
On 05/04/2016 01:55 PM, Suman Anna wrote: > On 05/04/2016 01:34 PM, Andrew F. Davis wrote: >> An rpmsg_driver does not need to set an owner, it will be populated by >> the driver core. > > spi_drivers in patch subject?? > copy/paste error, this is all based on my SPI patches that do this same th

Re: [PATCH 2/4] rpmsg: drop owner assignment from spi_drivers

2016-05-04 Thread Suman Anna
On 05/04/2016 01:34 PM, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > An rpmsg_driver does not need to set an owner, it will be populated by > the driver core. spi_drivers in patch subject?? regards Suman > > Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis > --- > Documentation/rpmsg.txt | 1 - > samples/rpmsg/rpmsg_c

[PATCH 2/4] rpmsg: drop owner assignment from spi_drivers

2016-05-04 Thread Andrew F. Davis
An rpmsg_driver does not need to set an owner, it will be populated by the driver core. Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis --- Documentation/rpmsg.txt | 1 - samples/rpmsg/rpmsg_client_sample.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/rpmsg.txt b/Documentation/r