On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> We already had a super-short blurb, but worth extending it I think:
> We're still pretty far away from anything like a consensus, but
> there's clearly a lot of people who prefer an as-light as possible
> approach to converting existi
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:40:35 +0100
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Jon, can you pls pick this one up, or want me to resend stand-alone?
I got it; I should get both applied before too long.
jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vg
We already had a super-short blurb, but worth extending it I think:
We're still pretty far away from anything like a consensus, but
there's clearly a lot of people who prefer an as-light as possible
approach to converting existing .txt files to .rst. Make sure this is
properly taken into account an
We already had a super-short blurb, but worth extending it I think:
We're still pretty far away from anything like a consensus, but
there's clearly a lot of people who prefer an as-light as possible
approach to converting existing .txt files to .rst. Make sure this is
properly taken into account an
