On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 01:08:49PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 04:56:37PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 02:12:26PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> [ . . . ]
>
> > > > +static int
> > > > +kfree_perf_thread(void *arg)
> > > > +{
> > > > +
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 04:56:37PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 02:12:26PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > > +static int
> > > +kfree_perf_thread(void *arg)
> > > +{
> > > + int i, loop = 0;
> > > + long me = (long)arg;
> > > + struct kfree_obj *alloc_ptr;
>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 02:12:26PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 03:01:55PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > This test runs kfree_rcu() in a loop to measure performance of the new
> > kfree_rcu() batching functionality.
> >
> > The following table shows results
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 03:01:55PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> This test runs kfree_rcu() in a loop to measure performance of the new
> kfree_rcu() batching functionality.
>
> The following table shows results when booting with arguments:
> rcuperf.kfree_loops=2 rcuperf.kfree_alloc
This test runs kfree_rcu() in a loop to measure performance of the new
kfree_rcu() batching functionality.
The following table shows results when booting with arguments:
rcuperf.kfree_loops=2 rcuperf.kfree_alloc_num=8000 rcuperf.kfree_rcu_test=1
In addition, rcuperf.kfree_no_batch is used to
