On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:10:19PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:33:08PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > As we support more than one compat formats, it looks more reasonable
> > to not use fs/compat_binfmt.c. Custom binfmt_elf32.c allows to move aarch32
> > specific defini
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:33:08PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> As we support more than one compat formats, it looks more reasonable
> to not use fs/compat_binfmt.c. Custom binfmt_elf32.c allows to move aarch32
> specific definitions there and make code more maintainable and readable.
Can you remind
As we support more than one compat formats, it looks more reasonable
to not use fs/compat_binfmt.c. Custom binfmt_elf32.c allows to move aarch32
specific definitions there and make code more maintainable and readable.
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 -
arch/ar
As we support more than one compat formats, it looks more reasonable
to not use fs/compat_binfmt.c. Custom binfmt_elf32.c allows to move aarch32
specific definitions there and make code more maintainable and readable.
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 -
arch/ar