On Tue, Nov 21 2023 at 13:44, Russell King wrote:
> ---
> An open question remains from the RFC v2 posting: should we provide a
> __weak stub for !HOTPLUG_CPU as well, since in later patches ACPI may
> reference this if the compiler doesn't optimise as we expect?
You mean:
extern void foo(void);
On 11/22/23 00:44, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
From: James Morse
Add arch_unregister_cpu() to allow the ACPI machinery to call
unregister_cpu(). This is enough for arm64, riscv and loongarch, but
needs to be overridden by x86 and ia64 who need to do more work.
CC: Jean-Philippe Brucker
Signe
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 13:44:31 +
Russell King wrote:
> From: James Morse
>
> Add arch_unregister_cpu() to allow the ACPI machinery to call
> unregister_cpu(). This is enough for arm64, riscv and loongarch, but
> needs to be overridden by x86 and ia64 who need to do more work.
>
> CC: Jean-Ph
From: James Morse
Add arch_unregister_cpu() to allow the ACPI machinery to call
unregister_cpu(). This is enough for arm64, riscv and loongarch, but
needs to be overridden by x86 and ia64 who need to do more work.
CC: Jean-Philippe Brucker
Signed-off-by: James Morse
Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang
