Re: [PATCH 08/19] arm64: introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread (for AArch32 compat)

On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 1:34:59 PM CEST Andreas Schwab wrote: > "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" writes: > > >> @@ -78,9 +79,9 @@ > >> > >> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > >> #define TASK_SIZE_32 UL(0x1) > >> -#define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \ > >> +#define TASK_

Re: [PATCH 08/19] arm64: introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread (for AArch32 compat)

"Zhangjian (Bamvor)" writes: >> @@ -78,9 +79,9 @@ >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT >> #define TASK_SIZE_32 UL(0x1) >> -#define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \ >> +#define TASK_SIZE (is_compat_task() ? \ >>

Re: [PATCH 08/19] arm64: introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread (for AArch32 compat)

Hi, On 2016/6/18 7:54, Yury Norov wrote: Based on patch of Andrew Pinski. This patch introduces is_a32_compat_task and is_a32_thread so it is easier to say this is a a32 specific thread or a generic compat thread/task. Corresponding functions are located in to avoid mess in headers. Some file

[PATCH 08/19] arm64: introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread (for AArch32 compat)

Based on patch of Andrew Pinski. This patch introduces is_a32_compat_task and is_a32_thread so it is easier to say this is a a32 specific thread or a generic compat thread/task. Corresponding functions are located in to avoid mess in headers. Some files include both and , and this is wrong beca