On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 05:46:30PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> So would the old hats be happier with a patch that looks like this? The
> quality of the formatted output suffers slightly, but it's not a big
> deal...
I think this a major improvement. The only thing that still strikes me
as ra
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 01:31:06 -0700
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 10:28:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > The point is to make the docs more discoverable by being able to
> > cross-link them. Old hats like us don't need that, but it definitely
> > has value in bringing new f
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 01:31:06 -0700
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 10:28:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > The point is to make the docs more discoverable by being able to
> > cross-link them. Old hats like us don't need that, but it definitely
> > has value in bringing new f
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 10:28:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> The point is to make the docs more discoverable by being able to
>> cross-link them. Old hats like us don't need that, but it definitely
>> has value in bringing new folks
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 10:28:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The point is to make the docs more discoverable by being able to
> cross-link them. Old hats like us don't need that, but it definitely
> has value in bringing new folks on board.
But do that in a way that keeps the old hats happy.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:19:50AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Aug 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > The ugly format is a major regression over a proper simple text
>> > file. What's the point?
>>
>> Major regression? Plea
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:19:50AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > The ugly format is a major regression over a proper simple text
> > file. What's the point?
>
> Major regression? Please be reasonable.
>
> I think the changes are rather small, and
On Tue, 09 Aug 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The ugly format is a major regression over a proper simple text
> file. What's the point?
Major regression? Please be reasonable.
I think the changes are rather small, and it's a fair compromise between
a simple text file and one that can be used
The ugly format is a major regression over a proper simple text
file. What's the point?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Fold the sparse document into the development tools set; no changes to the
text itself beyond formatting.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet
---
Documentation/{sparse.txt => dev-tools/sparse.rst} | 61 +-
Documentation/dev-tools/tools.rst | 1 +
2 files changed,
10 matches
Mail list logo
