On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 03:42:25 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 03/15/2018 10:42 AM, David Howells wrote:
Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU?
RISC-V ?
(evil grin :-)
Is anyone producing a chip that includes enough
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:56:48AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:42 AM, David Howells wrote:
> > Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU?
Please don't kill !MMU.
> Yes, plenty.
> I've made an overview of the remaining architectures for my own refere
On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 10:08 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:56:46AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > I have a patchset that creates a vsprintf extension for
> > print_vma_addr and removes all the uses similar to the
> > print_symbol() removal.
> >
> > This now avoids any pos
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:56:46AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> I have a patchset that creates a vsprintf extension for
> print_vma_addr and removes all the uses similar to the
> print_symbol() removal.
>
> This now avoids any possible printk interleaving.
>
> Unfortunately, without some #ifdef in
On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 10:48 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:42 AM, David Howells wrote:
> > Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU?
>
> Sure: arm, c6x, m68k, microblaze, and sh.
I have a patchset that creates a vsprintf extension for
pr
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42:25AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Is anyone producing a chip that includes enough of the Privileged ISA spec
> to have things like system calls, but not the MMU parts?
Various SiFive SOCs seem to support M and U mode, but no S mode or
iommu. That should be enough fo
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 03/15/2018 10:42 AM, David Howells wrote:
>> Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU?
>>
> RISC-V ?
> (evil grin :-)
Is anyone producing a chip that includes enough of the Privileged ISA spec
to have things like system cal
On 03/15/2018 10:42 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU?
>
RISC-V ?
(evil grin :-)
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes ReineckeTeamlead Storage & Networking
h...@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Max
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:42 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU?
Yes, plenty. I was wondering the same thing, but it seems that the architectures
we remove are almost completely representative of what we support overall,
except that they are all not l
Hi David,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:42 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU?
Sure: arm, c6x, m68k, microblaze, and sh.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.o
Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Here is the collection of patches I have applied to my 'asm-generic' tree
on top of the 'metag' removal. This does not include any of the device
drivers, I'll send those separately to a someone different list of people.
The removal came out of a discussion that is now documented at
https://lwn.net
12 matches
Mail list logo
