On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 01:46:24PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 04:34:58PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 01:28:08PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 03:01:54PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > >
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 04:34:58PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 01:28:08PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 03:01:54PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This is a series on top of the patch "rcu/tree: Add basic support f
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 01:28:08PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 03:01:54PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a series on top of the patch "rcu/tree: Add basic support for
> > kfree_rcu() batching".
> >
> > Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/201
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 03:01:54PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a series on top of the patch "rcu/tree: Add basic support for
> kfree_rcu() batching".
>
> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20190814160411.58591-1-j...@joelfernandes.org
>
> It adds performance tests, some
Hi,
This is a series on top of the patch "rcu/tree: Add basic support for
kfree_rcu() batching".
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20190814160411.58591-1-j...@joelfernandes.org
It adds performance tests, some clean ups and removal of "lazy" RCU callbacks.
Now that kfree_rcu() is handled separatel
