Re: [PATCH 0/2] extend PWM framework to support PWM dead-times

2017-09-06 Thread m18063
Hi Thierry, Please, do you have any inputs on my previous proposals? Thank you, Claudiu On 22.08.2017 15:24, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > 2017-08-22 14:11 GMT+02:00 m18063 : >> Hi Thierry, >> >> I added few other comments below. Please let me know what you think. >> >> Thank you, >> Claudiu >> >>

Re: [PATCH 0/2] extend PWM framework to support PWM dead-times

2017-08-22 Thread m18063
On 22.08.2017 15:24, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > 2017-08-22 14:11 GMT+02:00 m18063 : >> Hi Thierry, >> >> I added few other comments below. Please let me know what you think. >> >> Thank you, >> Claudiu >> >> On 21.08.2017 14:25, Thierry Reding wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 01:23:08PM +0300,

Re: [PATCH 0/2] extend PWM framework to support PWM dead-times

2017-08-22 Thread Benjamin Gaignard
2017-08-22 14:11 GMT+02:00 m18063 : > Hi Thierry, > > I added few other comments below. Please let me know what you think. > > Thank you, > Claudiu > > On 21.08.2017 14:25, Thierry Reding wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 01:23:08PM +0300, m18063 wrote: >>> Hi Thierry, >>> >>> Thank you for your re

Re: [PATCH 0/2] extend PWM framework to support PWM dead-times

2017-08-22 Thread m18063
Hi Thierry, I added few other comments below. Please let me know what you think. Thank you, Claudiu On 21.08.2017 14:25, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 01:23:08PM +0300, m18063 wrote: >> Hi Thierry, >> >> Thank you for your response. I added few comments below. >> >> Thank you,

Re: [PATCH 0/2] extend PWM framework to support PWM dead-times

2017-08-21 Thread Thierry Reding
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 01:23:08PM +0300, m18063 wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > Thank you for your response. I added few comments below. > > Thank you, > Claudiu > > On 21.08.2017 11:25, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 03:15:51PM +0300, Claudiu Beznea wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Pl

Re: [PATCH 0/2] extend PWM framework to support PWM dead-times

2017-08-21 Thread m18063
Hi Thierry, Thank you for your response. I added few comments below. Thank you, Claudiu On 21.08.2017 11:25, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 03:15:51PM +0300, Claudiu Beznea wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Please give feedback on these patches which extends the PWM >> framework in order

Re: [PATCH 0/2] extend PWM framework to support PWM dead-times

2017-08-21 Thread Thierry Reding
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 03:15:51PM +0300, Claudiu Beznea wrote: > Hi all, > > Please give feedback on these patches which extends the PWM > framework in order to support multiple PWM signal types. > Since I didn't receive any inputs on RFC series I'm resending it as > normal patch series. > > The

[PATCH 0/2] extend PWM framework to support PWM dead-times

2017-05-09 Thread Claudiu Beznea
Hi all, Please give feedback on these patches which extends the PWM framework in order to support multiple PWM signal types. Since I didn't receive any inputs on RFC series I'm resending it as normal patch series. The current patch series add the following PWM signal types: - PWM complementary si