On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 02:31:42PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu 2025-04-10 10:44:31, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Some system owners use slab_debug=FPZ (or similar) as a hardening option,
> > but do not want to be forced into having kernel addresses exposed due
> > to the implicit "no_hash_pointers"
On Thu 2025-04-10 10:44:31, Kees Cook wrote:
> Some system owners use slab_debug=FPZ (or similar) as a hardening option,
> but do not want to be forced into having kernel addresses exposed due
> to the implicit "no_hash_pointers" boot param setting.[1]
>
> Introduce the "hash_pointers" boot param,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025, Kees Cook wrote:
> Some system owners use slab_debug=FPZ (or similar) as a hardening option,
> but do not want to be forced into having kernel addresses exposed due
> to the implicit "no_hash_pointers" boot param setting.[1]
>
> Introduce the "hash_pointers" boot param, which
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 10:44:31AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Some system owners use slab_debug=FPZ (or similar) as a hardening option,
> but do not want to be forced into having kernel addresses exposed due
> to the implicit "no_hash_pointers" boot param setting.[1]
>
> Introduce the "hash_pointer
On 4/10/25 19:44, Kees Cook wrote:
> Some system owners use slab_debug=FPZ (or similar) as a hardening option,
> but do not want to be forced into having kernel addresses exposed due
> to the implicit "no_hash_pointers" boot param setting.[1]
>
> Introduce the "hash_pointers" boot param, which def
Some system owners use slab_debug=FPZ (or similar) as a hardening option,
but do not want to be forced into having kernel addresses exposed due
to the implicit "no_hash_pointers" boot param setting.[1]
Introduce the "hash_pointers" boot param, which defaults to "auto"
(the current behavior), but a
