Re: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-12 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 03:38:48 - "James Johnston" wrote: > My mail client is determined to embarrass me. :( Trying again... Worked this time! Applied to the docs tree, thanks. jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majord...@

Re: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-10 Thread David Howells
Reviewed-by: David Howells -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

RE: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-09 Thread James Johnston
cement-doc branch. My mail client is determined to embarrass me. :( Trying again... James >From 033be2a07878841081a30408aecce3a6b6c8f677 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Johnston Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:54:38 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing e

RE: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-09 Thread James Johnston
8f677 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Johnston Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:54:38 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter. Modify the documentation to match the actual parameter as implemented in kernel/module.c:273. Signed-off-by: James Johnst

Re: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-09 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 01:45:17 - "James Johnston" wrote: > Modify the documentation to match the actual parameter as implemented in > kernel/module.c:273. So I was going to apply this to the docs tree, but it's been white-space mangled. Care to fix your mail client and resend? Thanks, jon --

RE: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-07 Thread James Johnston
David Howells wrote: > James Johnston wrote: > > > -If CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is enabled or enforcemodulesig=1 is > > supplied on > > +If CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is enabled or module.sig_enforce=1 is > > +supplied > > You're definitely right about the change from enforcemodulesig to > sig_enf

Re: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-07 Thread David Howells
James Johnston wrote: > -If CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is enabled or enforcemodulesig=1 is supplied on > +If CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is enabled or module.sig_enforce=1 is supplied You're definitely right about the change from enforcemodulesig to sig_enforce, but how does the "module." come about?

[PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-06 Thread James Johnston
>From 033be2a07878841081a30408aecce3a6b6c8f677 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Johnston Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:54:38 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter. Modify the documentation to match the actual parameter as implemented in ker