Re: [PATCH] docs: refcount_t documentation

2017-12-11 Thread Kees Cook
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:46:35 +0200 > Elena Reshetova wrote: > >> Some functions from refcount_t API provide different >> memory ordering guarantees that their atomic counterparts. >> This adds a document outlining these differences ( >> Do

Re: [PATCH] docs: refcount_t documentation

2017-12-11 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:46:35 +0200 Elena Reshetova wrote: > Some functions from refcount_t API provide different > memory ordering guarantees that their atomic counterparts. > This adds a document outlining these differences ( > Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst) as well as > some oth

Re: [PATCH] docs: refcount_t documentation

2017-12-07 Thread Kees Cook
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:46:35 +0200 > Elena Reshetova wrote: > >> Some functions from refcount_t API provide different >> memory ordering guarantees that their atomic counterparts. >> This adds a document outlining these differences ( >> Doc

Re: [PATCH] docs: refcount_t documentation

2017-12-07 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:46:35 +0200 Elena Reshetova wrote: > Some functions from refcount_t API provide different > memory ordering guarantees that their atomic counterparts. > This adds a document outlining these differences ( > Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst) as well as > some oth

[PATCH] docs: refcount_t documentation

2017-12-05 Thread Elena Reshetova
Some functions from refcount_t API provide different memory ordering guarantees that their atomic counterparts. This adds a document outlining these differences ( Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst) as well as some other minor improvements. Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova Signed-off-by: