Re: [PATCH] Documentation: i2c: drop unnecessary .owner field in examples

2018-02-03 Thread Nicholas Mc Guire
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 09:28:47PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:24:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > > > From: Nicholas Mc Guire > > > > > > Currently there are a few drivers that still set the .owner > >

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: i2c: drop unnecessary .owner field in examples

2018-01-15 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:24:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > > From: Nicholas Mc Guire > > > > Currently there are a few drivers that still set the .owner > > in the i2c_driver structure - all of which are reported by > > coccin

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: i2c: drop unnecessary .owner field in examples

2018-01-15 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > From: Nicholas Mc Guire > > Currently there are a few drivers that still set the .owner > in the i2c_driver structure - all of which are reported by > coccinelle (scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci) > and there are no

[PATCH] Documentation: i2c: drop unnecessary .owner field in examples

2018-01-15 Thread Nicholas Mc Guire
From: Nicholas Mc Guire Currently there are a few drivers that still set the .owner in the i2c_driver structure - all of which are reported by coccinelle (scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci) and there are no cases that set the .onwer and do not call any of the functions that