Re: [LTP] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v9 00/24] ILP32 for ARM64

On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 12:43:11PM +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > Hi! > > > There is a problem with the stack size accounting during execve when > > > there is no stack limit: > > > > > > $ ulimit -s > > > 8192 > > > $ ./hello.ilp32 > > > Hello World! > > > $ ulimit -s unlimited > > > $ ./hello.ilp3

Re: [LTP] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v9 00/24] ILP32 for ARM64

On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 12:43:11PM +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > Hi! > > > There is a problem with the stack size accounting during execve when > > > there is no stack limit: > > > > > > $ ulimit -s > > > 8192 > > > $ ./hello.ilp32 > > > Hello World! > > > $ ulimit -s unlimited > > > $ ./hello.ilp3

Re: [LTP] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v9 00/24] ILP32 for ARM64

Hi! > > There is a problem with the stack size accounting during execve when > > there is no stack limit: > > > > $ ulimit -s > > 8192 > > $ ./hello.ilp32 > > Hello World! > > $ ulimit -s unlimited > > $ ./hello.ilp32 > > Segmentation fault > > $ strace ./hello.ilp32 > > execve("./hello.ilp32",

Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v9 00/24] ILP32 for ARM64

+ l...@lists.linux.it > There is a problem with the stack size accounting during execve when > there is no stack limit: > > $ ulimit -s > 8192 > $ ./hello.ilp32 > Hello World! > $ ulimit -s unlimited > $ ./hello.ilp32 > Segmentation fault > $ strace ./hello.ilp32 > execve("./hello.ilp32", ["./h