Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] Documentation/atomic_ops.txt: convert to ReST markup

2016-11-27 Thread S. Fricke
sertions(+), 377 deletions(-) > > Not a fan of this. The atomic_ops.txt file needs a lot of love, and I > wouldn't want to edit a .rst file. What is the problem with this rst-file? atomic_ops.rst are not so different to the txt variant. I will drop this patch. Best regards,

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] Documentation/local_ops.txt: convert to ReST markup

2016-11-25 Thread S. Fricke
t; > +Here is a sample module which implements a basic per cpu counter using > > +``local.h``. > > + > > +.. code-block:: c > > Better to use :: instead of code-block. > > > + > > +/* test-local.c > > + * > > + * Sample module for loc

Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] Documentation/workqueue.txt: convert to ReST markup

2016-10-24 Thread S. Fricke
misc/index The needs to be removed too. > > Indices and tables > ====== > [...] Sorry, Silvio -- -- S. Fricke sil...@port1024.net -- Diplom-Informatiker (FH) Linux-Entwicklung

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Documentation/workqueue.txt: convert to ReST markup

2016-10-24 Thread S. Fricke
to take it through the > docs tree with your ack so I don't have to write yet another note to Linus > explaining the index.rst conflicts... > > Sound OK? > > Thanks, > > jon -- -- S. Fricke sil...@port1024.net -- Diplom-Info

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] kernel-doc: better parsing of named variable arguments

2016-10-17 Thread S. Fricke
Hi Jani, thanks for your review. > On Sun, 16 Oct 2016, Silvio Fricke wrote: > > Without this patch we get warnings for named variable arguments. > > > > warning: No description found for parameter '...' > > warning: Excess function parameter 'args' description in > > 'alloc_ordered_wor