Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/28] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (AMD)

2017-02-21 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 19:12 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:41:59AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote: > > > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.txt > >  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h > >  create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/mem_e

Re: utime accounting regression since 4.6 (was: Re: [PACTH v2 0/3] Implement /proc//totmaps)

2016-09-30 Thread Rik van Riel
On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 11:49 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > [CC Mike and Mel as they have seen some accounting oddities >  when doing performance testing. They can share details but >  essentially the system time just gets too high] > > For your reference the email thread started > http://lkml.kernel

Re: utime accounting regression since 4.6 (was: Re: [PACTH v2 0/3] Implement /proc//totmaps)

2016-08-23 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 16:33 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 23-08-16 10:26:03, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 22-08-16 19:47:09, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Mon 22-08-16 19:29:36, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Mon 22-08-16 18:45:54, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > I have no idea w

Re: [PATCH] kernel: fs: drop_caches: add dds drop_caches_count

2016-02-16 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 16:28 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 03:52:31PM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote: > > On 02/15/2016 03:05 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > >  > > > As for a replacement, looking at what pages you consider > > > "droppable" > > > is really only file pages that are no