gt; Peter add it.
>
Sounds good.
> Will you be handling the backport into the RHEL 8 kernels? I'll
> submit this to Ubuntu and linux-stable once it gets accepted.
>
Yep.
> Thanks again,
Thank you :)
Cheers,
Phil
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 12:13 PM Phil Au
most 30x performance
> improvement, while still maintaining correct cpu quota restrictions.
> That testcase is available at https://github.com/indeedeng/fibtest.
>
> Fixes: 512ac999d275 ("sched/fair: Fix bandwidth timer clock drift condition")
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chiluk
that the non-cpu bound
> application
> +will use up to sched_cfs_bandwidth_slice_us additional quota in some periods,
> +thereby preventing the cpu-bound application from fully using it's quota by
"its quota"
> +that same amount. In these instances it will be up to the CFS algorithm (see
> +sched-design-CFS.txt) to decide which application is chosen to run, as they
> +will both be runnable and have remaining quota. This runtime discrepancy
> will
> +should made up in the following periods when the interactive application
> idles.
> +
"discrepancy will be made" or "descrepancy should be made" but not both :)
Otherwise, fwiw,
Acked-by: Phil Auld
Cheers,
Phil
--
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:14:36AM -0500 Dave Chiluk wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:32 AM Phil Auld wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 02:01:58PM -0700 Peter Oskolkov wrote:
>
> > > If the machine runs at/close to capacity, won't the overallocation
> >
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 02:01:58PM -0700 Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:44 AM Dave Chiluk wrote:
> >
> > It has been observed, that highly-threaded, non-cpu-bound applications
> > running under cpu.cfs_quota_us constraints can hit a high percentage of
> > periods throttled whil
