On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 at 15:11, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> Hm, I thought we set some things in fuse_mount and fuse_conn in there that
> are then queried by fuse_send_init()... Maybe the only thing
> fuse_send_init() needs is fm->sb->s_bdi->ra_pages for max_readahead.
Yes, that definitely needs spe
On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 at 14:37, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> I honestly have no idea how to go about it on a technical level,
> though. Naïvely, I think we’d need to split off the tail of
> fuse_fill_super_common() (everything starting from the
> fuse_get_root_inode() call) into a separate function, wh
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 13:19, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We want to be able to mount filesystems that just consist of one regular
> file via virtio-fs, i.e. no root directory, just a file as the root
> node.
>
> While that is possible via FUSE itself (through the 'rootmode' mount
> option, w
On Wed, 22 May 2024 at 12:16, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> The first open would cache the extent list in fuse_inode and
> second open would verify that the extent list matches.
>
> Last file close could clean the cache extent list or not - that
> is an API decision.
Well, current API clears the mappi
On Wed, 22 May 2024 at 04:05, John Groves wrote:
> I'm happy to help with that if you care - ping me if so; getting a VM running
> in EFI mode is not necessary if you reserve the dax memory via memmap=, or
> via libvirt xml.
Could you please give an example?
I use a raw qemu command line with a
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 07:52, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> I'm not virtiofs expert, but I don't think that you are wrong about this.
> IIUC, virtiofsd could map arbitrary memory region to any fuse file mmaped
> by virtiofs client.
>
> So what are the gaps between virtiofs and famfs that justify a new
the
>> caller's credentials. The module boolean parameter and mount option
>> override_creds is also added as a presence check for this "feature",
>> existence of /sys/module/overlay/parameters/overlay_creds.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Salyzyn
>&
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 07/20/2017 03:20 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
>>>
>>>>> @@ -603,7 +698,13 @@ static struct dentry *dentry_kill(struct dentry
>>>>>
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 04:24 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> The number of positive dentries is limited by the number of files
>>> in the filesystems. The number of
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> The number of positive dentries is limited by the number of files
> in the filesystems. The number of negative dentries, however,
> has no limit other than the total amount of memory available in
> the system. So a rogue application that genera
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> The number of positive dentries is limited by the number of files
> in the filesystems. The number of negative dentries, however,
> has no limit other than the total amount of memory available in
> the system. So a rogue application that genera
11 matches
Mail list logo
