7;m not sure if it's
> possible apply a __tagged/__untagged kind of attribute to non-pointer
> types, is it?
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10581535/
It's something that should need to be added to sparse since it's
different from what sparse already have (the existing __bitwise and
concept of address-space doesn't seem to do the job here).
-- Luc Van Oostenryck
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:24:23PM +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
> index 3e7dafb3ea80..39f668d5066b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
> @@ -16,9 +16,13 @@
> /* all cla
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 07:14:13PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
>
> While comment parsing is a good idea to deal with old codebases
> that used such a comment as documentation for humans, the best
> solution is to use the attribute:
>
> * It is a "real" part of the AST (=> better for tooling).
T
patchset).
> - Added more context to the cover letter.
> - Updated Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt.
Hi,
I'm quite hapy now with what concerns me (sparse).
Please, feel free to add my:
Reviewed-by: Luc Van Oostenryck
Cheers,
-- Luc Van Oostenryck
ty to recognize __has_attribute
> on its own.
>
> Finally, the nonstring variable attribute series has been applied on top
> of this one.
Hi Miguel,
Feel free to add my
Reviewed-by: Luc Van Oostenryck
on patches 11-15 (I think the others ones already have it).
-- Luc
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:42:33AM -0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> +
> +$ git --list-key torva...@kernel.org
Small typo here: you meant 'gpg --list-key' instead of 'git ...'
Regards,
-- Luc Van Oostenryck
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line &quo
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-06-03 22:26, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 08:37:21PM +0200, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Jun 3,
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 08:37:21PM +0200, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
pport these annotations, of course.
In this case, I suppose you're talking about '__must_hold()' which
*must* be used instead of a pair of '__releases()' + '__acquires()'
when the lock is help on function entry and exit.
Cheers,
-- Luc Van Oostenryck
--
To unsubscribe
