RE: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-09 Thread James Johnston
cement-doc branch. My mail client is determined to embarrass me. :( Trying again... James -------- >From 033be2a07878841081a30408aecce3a6b6c8f677 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Johnston Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:54:38 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing e

RE: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-09 Thread James Johnston
n Sorry about that. I assume you are talking about the wrapping my client did at 76 characters. Let's try this again... It's also available at https://github.com/JohnstonJ/linux.git in the fix-modsign-enforcement-doc branch. >From 033be2a07878841081a30408aecce3a6b6c

RE: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-07 Thread James Johnston
David Howells wrote: > James Johnston wrote: > > > -If CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is enabled or enforcemodulesig=1 is > > supplied on > > +If CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is enabled or module.sig_enforce=1 is > > +supplied > > You're definitely right

[PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter.

2016-03-06 Thread James Johnston
>From 033be2a07878841081a30408aecce3a6b6c8f677 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Johnston Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:54:38 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] modsign: Fix documentation on module signing enforcement parameter. Modify the documentation to match the actual parameter as implemented in ker