On 8/20/19 3:09 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 9:26 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
< snip - the stuff I snipped deserves reply, but I want to focus on just
one topic for this reply >
>> You have a real bug. I have told you how to fix the real bug. An
On 8/19/19 5:09 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 2:30 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>> On 8/19/19 1:49 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:16 AM Frank Rowand
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 8/15/19 6:50 PM,
On 8/19/19 1:49 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:16 AM Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>> On 8/15/19 6:50 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 7:06 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 7/23/19 5:10 PM, Saravana Kannan
On 8/15/19 6:50 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 7:06 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>> On 7/23/19 5:10 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>>> Add device-links after the devices are created (but before they are
>>> probed) by looking at common DT bindings
On 7/23/19 5:10 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Add device-links after the devices are created (but before they are
> probed) by looking at common DT bindings like clocks and
> interconnects.
>
> Automatically adding device-links for functional dependencies at the
> framework level provides the follo
On 5/11/19 10:33 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 02:12:40PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> However, the reply is incorrect. Kselftest in-kernel tests (which
>> is the context here) can be configured as built in instead of as
>> a module, and built
On 5/14/19 1:38 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 03:13:40PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 5/10/19 9:17 AM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2019-05-09 11:18 p.m., Frank Rowand wrote:
>>>
>>>> YES, kselftest ha
On 5/10/19 9:17 AM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-05-09 11:18 p.m., Frank Rowand wrote:
>
>> YES, kselftest has in-kernel tests. (Excuse the shouting...)
>
> Cool. From my cursory look, in my opinion, these would be greatly
> improved by converting them
On 5/10/19 1:54 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 5:13 AM Knut Omang wrote:
>> On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 03:23 -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>>>> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:49 AM Knut Omang wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 2019-05-09 at
On 5/10/19 3:23 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:49 AM Knut Omang wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2019-05-09 at 22:18 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>>> On 5/9/19 4:40 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>&
On 5/9/19 3:20 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-05-09 3:42 p.m., Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 11:12:12AM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>>
>>> "My understanding is that the intent of KUnit is to avoid booting a
>>
On 5/9/19 2:42 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 11:12:12AM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>>"My understanding is that the intent of KUnit is to avoid booting a
>> kernel on
>>real hardware or in a virtual machine. That seems to be
On 5/10/19 3:43 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:11:01PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>>> You *can* run in-kernel test using modules; but there is no framework
>>>> for the in-kernel code found in the test modules, which means each of
>>>
On 2/2/19 12:56 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 02:04:16PM -0800, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
>>Include documentation for each *function* in *source*.
>> - If no *function* if specified, the documentaion for all functions
>> + If no *function* if specified, the documenta
On 1/7/19 11:24 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2019-01-07 11:06:27, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>> + Frank
>>
>> On 1/7/19 10:37 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Is it "Device Tree" or "device tree"?
>>>
>>> pavel@duo:/data
On 1/7/19 10:45 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 12:37 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
>>
>> Is it "Device Tree" or "device tree"?
>>
>> pavel@duo:/data/l/k/Documentation$ grep -r "Device Tree" | wc -l
>> 235
>> pavel@duo:/data/l/k/Documentation$ grep -r "device tree" | wc -l
>> 595
>>
+ Frank
On 1/7/19 10:37 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Is it "Device Tree" or "device tree"?
>
> pavel@duo:/data/l/k/Documentation$ grep -r "Device Tree" | wc -l
> 235
> pavel@duo:/data/l/k/Documentation$ grep -r "device tree" | wc -l
> 595
>
> I guess it would be nice to make it cons
On 07/21/17 10:27, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 18:30:55 -0700
> frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst contains a non-ascii
>> character. Change it to the ascii equivalent.
>
> You should know better than to tell somebody like me that a h
On 07/03/17 01:25, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 05:46:25PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> I've just spent rather more time than I would like figuring out why the PDF
>> builds fail and what was needed to fix it. The result is the following
>> patch series. It's a combination o
On 06/18/17 07:05, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:49:04PM -0700, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Frank Rowand
>>
>> The Devicetree Specification has superseded the ePAPR as the
>> base specification for bindings. Update files in Documentat
20 matches
Mail list logo
