On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 4:40 PM Brendan Higgins
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 2:01 PM SeongJae Park wrote:
> >
> > kunit wrapper script ('kunit.py') receives a sub-command (only 'run' for
> > now) as its argument. If no sub-command is given, it pri
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 08:09:18AM +0200, Knut Omang wrote:
> The generic netlink protocol used to communicate between
> kernel and user space about tests and test results, as well as some
> means for configuring tests within the kernel.
>
> Unlike other kernel side test code in the kernel, ktf do
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 08:09:17AM +0200, Knut Omang wrote:
Sorry, it's taken me way too long to get down to a proper code review on
this. I was hoping to send you something a couple weeks ago in
preparation for Tuesday, but I have been crazy busy.
> The ktf module itself and basic data structure
the kunit
> documentation for a verification of kunit is missing the sub-command.
> This commit fixes the example.
>
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
> ---
> Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:18 PM shuah wrote:
>
> On 8/26/19 6:37 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > Update to add clarity and recommendations on running newer kselftests
> > on older kernels vs. matching the kernel and kselftest revisions.
> >
> > The recommendation is "Match kernel revision and kselftest
d-off-by: Shuah Khan
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
One minor comment below.
> ---
> Changes since v1: Fixed "WARNING: Title underline too short."
>
> Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst | 25 +
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:34 AM shuah wrote:
>
> On 8/23/19 11:27 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:05 AM shuah wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8/23/19 10:48 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:33 AM shuah wrote:
&g
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:07 AM shuah wrote:
>
> On 8/23/19 10:56 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:36 AM shuah wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Brendan,
> >>
> >> On 8/20/19 5:20 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> >>> Add support
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:05 AM shuah wrote:
>
> On 8/23/19 10:48 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:33 AM shuah wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Brendan,
> >>
> >> On 8/20/19 5:20 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> >>> Add core fa
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:36 AM shuah wrote:
>
> Hi Brendan,
>
> On 8/20/19 5:20 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > Add support for aborting/bailing out of test cases, which is needed for
> > implementing assertions.
> >
> > An assertion is like an expecta
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:33 AM shuah wrote:
>
> Hi Brendan,
>
> On 8/20/19 5:20 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > Add core facilities for defining unit tests; this provides a common way
> > to define test cases, functions that execute code which is under test
> >
Add support for expectations, which allow properties to be specified and
then verified in tests.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd
---
include/kunit/test.h | 834
## TL;DR
This revision addresses comments from Stephen and Bjorn Helgaas. Most
changes are pretty minor stuff that doesn't affect the API in anyway.
One significant change, however, is that I added support for freeing
kunit_resource managed resources before the test case is finished via
kunit_reso
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 4:29 AM Knut Omang wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 01:17 -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:11 PM Knut Omang wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Alan Maguire (3):
> > > ktf: Implementation of ktf support for overrid
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 2:51 AM Knut Omang wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 10:23 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 08:09:15AM +0200, Knut Omang wrote:
> > > and in the making::
> > >
> > > kunit/(kernel only (UML))
> >
> > You are going to have t
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:11 PM Knut Omang wrote:
[...]
> Alan Maguire (3):
> ktf: Implementation of ktf support for overriding function entry and return.
> ktf: A simple debugfs interface to test results
> ktf: Simple coverage support
>
> Knut Omang (16):
> kbuild: Fixes to rules for hos
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:11 PM Knut Omang wrote:
>
> KTF has already been available for a while as a separate git repository with
> means to facilitate use with any kernel version.
>
> KTF can be used both for "pure" unit testing and for more pragmatic
> approaches to component testing. Apart fr
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:43 PM Brendan Higgins
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:14 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-01 11:59:57)
> > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:55 AM Brendan Higgins
> > > wrote:
> > > >
>
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:50 AM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-16 01:37:34)
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 12:57 AM Brendan Higgins
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > A `struct kunit_stream` is usually associated with a message that is
> >
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:49 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> On 5/10/19 2:03 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 6:23 PM kbuild test robot wrote:
> >> tree:
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kb
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 03:17:09PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> Add myself as maintainer of KUnit, the Linux kernel's unit testing
> framework.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
> ---
> MAINTAINE
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 12:16:23PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2019 11:08:10 -0700
> Brendan Higgins wrote:
>
> > > Naturally, though, I have one request: I'd rather not see this at the top
> > > level, which is more than crowded eno
.
- provide function to invoke the kernel and stream the output back.
Signed-off-by: Felix Guo
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
tools/testing/kunit/.gitignore| 3 +
tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
Add documentation for KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework.
- Add intro and usage guide for KUnit
- Add API reference
Signed-off-by: Felix Guo
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst
Add myself as maintainer of KUnit, the Linux kernel's unit testing
framework.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
MAINTAINERS | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
Add defconfig for UML and a fragment that can be used to configure other
architectures for building KUnit tests. Add option to kunit_tool to use
a defconfig to create the kunitconfig.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
arch/um
Add entry for the new proc sysctl KUnit test to the PROC SYSCTL section.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 8a91887c8d541..2e539647589fd
Add KUnit tests for the KUnit test abort mechanism (see preceding
commit). Add tests both for general try catch mechanism as well as
non-architecture specific mechanism.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
kunit/Makefile| 3
From: Iurii Zaikin
KUnit tests for initialized data behavior of proc_dointvec that is
explicitly checked in the code. Includes basic parsing tests including
int min/max overflow.
Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan
. Logically
speaking, these are the premises of the test case, so if a premise isn't
true, there is no point in continuing the test case because there are no
conclusions that can be drawn without the premises. Whereas, the
expectation is the thing you are trying to prove.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Hi
still
express the idea of a premise using the above idiom, but I think
KUNIT_ASSERT_* states the intended idea perfectly.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
include/kunit/test.h | 498 -
kunit/s
Add a test for string stream along with a simpler example.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
kunit/Kconfig | 25 ++-
kunit/Makefile | 4 ++
kunit/example-test.c | 88
A lot of the expectation and assertion infrastructure prints out fairly
complicated test failure messages, so add a C++ style log library for
for logging test results.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
include/kunit/kunit-stream.h
KUnit is a new unit testing framework for the kernel and when used is
built into the kernel as a part of it. Add KUnit to the root Kconfig and
Makefile to allow it to be actually built.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
Kconfig
: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
kunit/test-test.c | 123 ++
1 file changed, 123 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kunit/test-test.c b/kunit/test-test.c
index 7afc9bb52f7be..ee926f798b266 100644
--- a/kunit
kernel, to
bail out of a broken test. As a consequence, it is a new __noreturn
function that objtool thinks is broken (as seen above). So fix this
warning by adding kunit_try_catch_throw to objtool's noreturn list.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Link:
Add support for expectations, which allow properties to be specified and
then verified in tests.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
include/kunit/test.h | 518 +++
kunit/test.c | 66
A number of test features need to do pretty complicated string printing
where it may not be possible to rely on a single preallocated string
with parameters.
So provide a library for constructing the string as you go similar to
C++'s std::string.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by:
;test resources" which are managed by the test infrastructure
and are automatically cleaned up at the conclusion of the test.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
include/kunit/test.h | 109
them test_modules).
Just define test cases and how to execute them for now; setting
expectations on code will be defined later.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
include/kunit/test.h | 162 ++
kunit/Kconfig
## TLDR
A quick follow up to yesterday's revision. I got some feedback that I
wanted to incorporate before anyone else read the update. For this
reason, I will leave a TLDR of the biggest changes since v2.
Biggest things to look out for (since v2):
- KUnit core now outputs results in TAP14.
- He
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 02:52:59PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to get back to this thread.
> On 5/9/19 3:20 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2019-05-09 3:42 p.m., Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 11:12:12AM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >>>
> >>> "My
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 02:05:05PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 8:04 AM Brendan Higgins
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 04:44:51PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 01:33:44PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
&g
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:46:55AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 01:12:23AM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 08:56:43AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:42:42PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 07:34:22AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2019 22:42:49 -0700
> Brendan Higgins wrote:
>
> > Add documentation for KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework.
> > - Add intro and usage guide for KUnit
> > - Add API refer
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 03:13:40PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 5/10/19 9:17 AM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2019-05-09 11:18 p.m., Frank Rowand wrote:
> >
> >> YES, kselftest has in-kernel tests. (Excuse the shouting...)
> >
> > Cool. From my cursory look, in my opinion, these wo
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 05:58:49PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> On 5/7/19 10:22 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 10:01:19AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> Not very helpful to cut the text here, plus not explicitly indicating that
> text was cut (yes, I know the ">>>" will
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 08:56:43AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:42:42PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > This fixes the following warning seen on GCC 7.3:
> > kunit/test-test.o: warning: objtool: kunit_test_unsuccessful_try() falls
> > thr
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 08:43:23AM +0200, Knut Omang wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 14:59 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > On 5/10/19 3:23 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > >> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:49 AM Knut Omang wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 08:17:47AM +0200, Knut Omang wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 15:18 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > On 5/10/19 1:54 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 5:13 AM Knut Omang wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 03:23 -0700, Bren
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 04:44:51PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 01:33:44PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 02:12:40PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > > However, the reply is incorrect. Kselftest in-kernel tests (which
> > > is the context here) can b
Add documentation for KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework.
- Add intro and usage guide for KUnit
- Add API reference
Signed-off-by: Felix Guo
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
Changes Since Last Revision:
- Addressed
Add KUnit tests for the KUnit test abort mechanism (see preceding
commit). Add tests both for general try catch mechanism as well as
non-architecture specific mechanism.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
kunit/Makefile| 3
.
- provide function to invoke the kernel and stream the output back.
Signed-off-by: Felix Guo
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
tools/testing/kunit/.gitignore| 3 +
tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
Add myself as maintainer of KUnit, the Linux kernel's unit testing
framework.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
Changes Since Last Revision:
- Added linux-kselftest@ as a mailing list entry for KUnit as requested
by
Add defconfig for UML and a fragment that can be used to configure other
architectures for building KUnit tests. Add option to kunit_tool to use
a defconfig to create the kunitconfig.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
arch/um
Add entry for the new proc sysctl KUnit test to the PROC SYSCTL section.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 8a91887c8d541..2e539647589fd
From: Iurii Zaikin
KUnit tests for initialized data behavior of proc_dointvec that is
explicitly checked in the code. Includes basic parsing tests including
int min/max overflow.
Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan
. Logically
speaking, these are the premises of the test case, so if a premise isn't
true, there is no point in continuing the test case because there are no
conclusions that can be drawn without the premises. Whereas, the
expectation is the thing you are trying to prove.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Hi
: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
Changes Since Last Revision:
- Added more details to change log as per Shuah's comments.
- Made use of new EXPECT macro for pointer comparison to warning
reported by kbuild bot.
---
kunit/test-test.c
still
express the idea of a premise using the above idiom, but I think
KUNIT_ASSERT_* states the intended idea perfectly.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
include/kunit/test.h | 498 -
kunit/s
This fixes the following warning seen on GCC 7.3:
kunit/test-test.o: warning: objtool: kunit_test_unsuccessful_try() falls
through to next function kunit_test_catch()
Reported-by: kbuild test robot
To: Josh Poimboeuf
To: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Link: https
Add a test for string stream along with a simpler example.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
Changes Since Last Revision:
- Added more Kconfig help text for KUNIT_TEST and KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST as
per Shuah's comments.
---
A lot of the expectation and assertion infrastructure prints out fairly
complicated test failure messages, so add a C++ style log library for
for logging test results.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
Changes Since Last Revision
;test resources" which are managed by the test infrastructure
and are automatically cleaned up at the conclusion of the test.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
include/kunit/test.h | 109
Add support for expectations, which allow properties to be specified and
then verified in tests.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
Changes Since Last Revision:
- Added EXPECT macros for pointer comparison to address issue pointed
A number of test features need to do pretty complicated string printing
where it may not be possible to rely on a single preallocated string
with parameters.
So provide a library for constructing the string as you go similar to
C++'s std::string.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by:
Add KUnit to root Kconfig and Makefile allowing it to actually be built.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
Changes Since Last Revision:
- Masahiro reported a number of issues here on the previous revision;
however, all of the
them test_modules).
Just define test cases and how to execute them for now; setting
expectations on code will be defined later.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
Changes Since Last Revision:
- Converted KUnit core to print test
## TLDR
I mostly wanted to incorporate feedback I got over the last week and a
half.
Biggest things to look out for:
- KUnit core now outputs results in TAP14.
- Heavily reworked tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
- Changed how parsing works.
- Added testing.
- Greg, Logan, you might want to re-
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On 08/09/2017 08:04 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>>>
>>> Perhaps that is some level of abuse, but it's pretty common. I'm not
>>> against it.
>>>
>>> There is standard IPMI firmware
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:56 AM, Anton D. Kachalov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to mention one of the our related work for IPMI and I2C.
>
> We use OpenIPMI stack to connect to the computing nodes through the I2C
> using IPMB (BT is not supported by nodes):
>
> https://github.com/ya-mouse/meta-
> Perhaps that is some level of abuse, but it's pretty common. I'm not
> against it.
>
> There is standard IPMI firmware NetFN (though no commands defined) that if
> you use
> the driver automatically goes into "Maintenance mode" and modified the
> timeouts
> and handling to some extent to help wi
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On 08/04/2017 08:18 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>>
>> This patchset introduces IPMI Block Transfer over I2C (BT-I2C), which has
>> the
>> same semantics as IPMI Block Transfer except it done over I2C.
>>
&
Added device tree binding documentation for ipmi-bt-i2c (host) and
ipmi-bmc-bt-i2c (BMC) and documentation for the Block Transfer over I2C
(bt-i2c) protocol.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
---
Changes for v2:
- Fixed a typo
- Reworded a sentence to make it clear that I was talking about
same BMC side file system interface as "ipmi-bt-host".
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
---
Changes for v2:
- None
---
drivers/char/Kconfig| 1 +
drivers/char/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/char/ipmi_bmc/Kconfig | 22 ++
drivers/char/ipmi_bm
This patchset introduces IPMI Block Transfer over I2C (BT-I2C), which has the
same semantics as IPMI Block Transfer except it done over I2C.
For the OpenBMC people, this is based on an RFC:
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/2016-September/004505.html
The documentation discusses the reaso
t i2c_device_id ipmi_bt_i2c_i2c_id[] = {
+ {"ipmi-bt-i2c", 0},
+ {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ipmi_bt_i2c_i2c_id);
+
+static struct i2c_driver ipmi_bt_i2c_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "ipmi-bt-i2c",
+ .acpi_match_table = ipmi_bt_
From: Benjamin Fair
The ipmi_bmc folder contains drivers for a BMC to communicate using
IPMI. The ipmi folder is only for drivers on the host side using the
OpenIPMI framework.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Fair
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
---
Added in v2:
---
drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Brendan Higgins
wrote:
> This patchset introduces IPMI Block Transfer over I2C (BT-I2C), which has the
> same semantics as IPMI Block Transfer except it done over I2C.
>
> The documentation discusses the reason for this in greater detail, suffice it
Added device tree binding documentation for ipmi-bt-i2c (host) and
ipmi-bmc-bt-i2c (BMC) and documentation for the Block Transfer over I2C
(bt-i2c) protocol.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
---
Documentation/bt-i2c.txt | 121 +
.../devicetree
This patchset introduces IPMI Block Transfer over I2C (BT-I2C), which has the
same semantics as IPMI Block Transfer except it done over I2C.
The documentation discusses the reason for this in greater detail, suffice it to
say SSIF cannot be correctly implemented on some naive I2C devices. There ar
bt_i2c_i2c_id[] = {
+ {"ipmi-bt-i2c", 0},
+ {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ipmi_bt_i2c_i2c_id);
+
+static struct i2c_driver ipmi_bt_i2c_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "ipmi-bt-i2c",
+ .acpi_match_table = ipmi_bt_i2c_acpi_id,
+ },
same BMC side file system interface as "ipmi-bt-host".
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
---
drivers/char/Kconfig| 1 +
drivers/char/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/char/ipmi_bmc/Kconfig | 22 ++
drivers/char/ipmi_bmc/Makefile | 5 +
dr
84 matches
Mail list logo
