SF Markus Elfring writes:
>> When someone tells you that you are wasting their time,
>
> This information can be useful to some degree
Yes. If you continue discussing after that point, then you make a clear
statement that it isn't an accident. You are deliberately wasting their
time.
A lot of
SF Markus Elfring writes:
>> go around bothering everyone with waste of time cleanup patches.
>
> I find it still debatable if the shown software development efforts
> are really "wasted".
When someone tells you that you are wasting their time, then that is not
a subject for further discussion.
Greg KH writes:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 07:14:52AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>
>> Good question. I would like to extend this USB port trigger in the
>> future by reacting to USB activity. This involves playing with URBs
>> and I believe that at that point it'd be getting too much USB specific
Rafał Miłecki writes:
> The last big missing thing is Documentation update (this is why I'm
> sending RFC). Greg pointed out we should have some entries in
> Documentation/ABI, but it seems none of triggers have it.
There's a lot missing, but there is at least one exception:
The "inverted" attri
Dan Carpenter writes:
> Hike up the mountain, then if you get stuck hike back down using the
> exact same path.
OK, I understand what you say. I just can't resist objecting to that
example ;)
In my experience, finding the exact same path back after hiking up a
mountain is really hard. Especial
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> foo = kmalloc(SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!foo)
> goto err_foo;
>
> foo->bar = kmalloc(SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!foo->bar)
> goto err_bar;
>
