Re: [PATCH] doc/RCU/listRCU: fix an example code snippets

2025-02-16 Thread Wei Yang
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 10:22:53AM +0800, Alan Huang wrote: >On Feb 17, 2025, at 10:12, Boqun Feng wrote: >> >> Hi Wei, >> >> The change loosk good to me, thanks! >> >> I queued the patch for futher reviews and tests with some changes in the >> commit log (for title formating and a bit more exp

Re: [PATCH v7 16/20] huge_memory: Add vmf_insert_folio_pmd()

2025-02-16 Thread Alistair Popple
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 07:45:09PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 04.02.25 23:48, Alistair Popple wrote: > > Currently DAX folio/page reference counts are managed differently to normal > > pages. To allow these to be managed the same as normal pages introduce > > vmf_insert_folio_pmd. This wi

Re: [PATCH net-next] tun: Pad virtio headers

2025-02-16 Thread Jason Wang
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 1:25 PM Akihiko Odaki wrote: > > On 2025/02/14 0:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:23:55PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote: > >> On 2025/02/13 16:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> > >>> Commit log needs some work. > >>> > >>> So my understanding is,

Re: [PATCH] doc/RCU/listRCU: fix an example code snippets

2025-02-16 Thread Boqun Feng
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 10:22:53AM +0800, Alan Huang wrote: > On Feb 17, 2025, at 10:12, Boqun Feng wrote: > > > > Hi Wei, > > > > The change loosk good to me, thanks! > > > > I queued the patch for futher reviews and tests with some changes in the > > commit log (for title formating and a bit

Re: [PATCH] doc/RCU/listRCU: fix an example code snippets

2025-02-16 Thread Alan Huang
On Feb 17, 2025, at 10:12, Boqun Feng wrote: > > Hi Wei, > > The change loosk good to me, thanks! > > I queued the patch for futher reviews and tests with some changes in the > commit log (for title formating and a bit more explanation), please see > below. > > Regards, > Boqun > > On Wed, Ja

Re: [PATCH] doc/RCU/listRCU: fix an example code snippets

2025-02-16 Thread Boqun Feng
Hi Wei, The change loosk good to me, thanks! I queued the patch for futher reviews and tests with some changes in the commit log (for title formating and a bit more explanation), please see below. Regards, Boqun On Wed, Jan 01, 2025 at 08:23:06AM +, Wei Yang wrote: > The example code for "E

[PATCH bpf-next v12 5/5] igc: Add launch time support to XDP ZC

2025-02-16 Thread Song Yoong Siang
Enable Launch Time Control (LTC) support for XDP zero copy via XDP Tx metadata framework. This patch has been tested with tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata on Intel I225-LM Ethernet controller. Below are the test steps and result. Test 1: Send a single packet with the launch time set to

[PATCH bpf-next v12 4/5] igc: Refactor empty frame insertion for launch time support

2025-02-16 Thread Song Yoong Siang
Refactor the code for inserting an empty frame into a new function igc_insert_empty_frame(). This change extracts the logic for inserting an empty packet from igc_xmit_frame_ring() into a separate function, allowing it to be reused in future implementations, such as the XDP zero copy transmit funct

[PATCH bpf-next v12 3/5] net: stmmac: Add launch time support to XDP ZC

2025-02-16 Thread Song Yoong Siang
Enable launch time (Time-Based Scheduling) support for XDP zero copy via the XDP Tx metadata framework. This patch has been tested with tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata on Intel Tiger Lake platform. Below are the test steps and result. Test 1: Send a single packet with the launch time

[PATCH bpf-next v12 2/5] selftests/bpf: Add launch time request to xdp_hw_metadata

2025-02-16 Thread Song Yoong Siang
Add launch time hardware offload request to xdp_hw_metadata. Users can configure the delta of launch time relative to HW RX-time using the "-l" argument. By default, the delta is set to 0 ns, which means the launch time is disabled. By setting the delta to a non-zero value, the launch time hardware

[PATCH bpf-next v12 1/5] xsk: Add launch time hardware offload support to XDP Tx metadata

2025-02-16 Thread Song Yoong Siang
Extend the XDP Tx metadata framework so that user can requests launch time hardware offload, where the Ethernet device will schedule the packet for transmission at a pre-determined time called launch time. The value of launch time is communicated from user space to Ethernet driver via launch_time f

[PATCH bpf-next v12 0/5] xsk: TX metadata Launch Time support

2025-02-16 Thread Song Yoong Siang
This series expands the XDP TX metadata framework to allow user applications to pass per packet 64-bit launch time directly to the kernel driver, requesting launch time hardware offload support. The XDP TX metadata framework will not perform any clock conversion or packet reordering. Please note t