Am 15.10.24 um 10:37 schrieb Heiko Carstens:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 09:16:45PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 14.10.24 20:48, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 04:46:17PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
to dump. Based on this, support for dumping virtio-mem memory can be
H
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 6:33 AM Rong Xu wrote:
>
> Enable the machine function split optimization for AutoFDO in Clang.
>
> Machine function split (MFS) is a pass in the Clang compiler that
> splits a function into hot and cold parts. The linker groups all
> cold blocks across functions together.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 6:33 AM Rong Xu wrote:
>
> Enable -ffunction-sections by default for the AutoFDO build.
>
> With -ffunction-sections, the compiler places each function in its own
> section named .text.function_name instead of placing all functions in
> the .text section. In the AutoFDO bui
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 6:33 AM Rong Xu wrote:
>
> When the -ffunction-sections compiler option is enabled, each function
> is placed in a separate section named .text.function_name rather than
> putting all functions in a single .text section.
>
> However, using -function-sections can cause probl
Please remove the period at the end of the commit subject.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 6:34 AM Rong Xu wrote:
>
> Add the build support for using Clang's Propeller optimizer. Like
> AutoFDO, Propeller uses hardware sampling to gather information
> about the frequency of execution of different code
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 6:33 AM Rong Xu wrote:
> +Customization
> +=
> +
> +You can enable or disable AutoFDO build for individual file and directories
> by
> +adding a line similar to the following to the respective kernel Makefile:
Perhaps, it might be worth mentioning that kern
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 1:58 AM Samuel Holland
wrote:
>
> The interface for controlling pointer masking in VS-mode is henvcfg.PMM,
> which is part of the Ssnpm extension, even though pointer masking in
> HS-mode is provided by the Smnpm extension. As a result, emulating Smnpm
> in the guest requir
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 12:31 PM Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>
> Hi Masahiro and Andrew,
>
> Top posting only for visibility. Would it make more sense to have this
> land via the Kbuild tree or -mm? The core of the series really touches
> Kbuild and I think the x86 stuff can just land with Acks, unle
