Re: [PATCH net-next v10 2/4] ethtool: provide customized dim profile management

On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:59:46 +0800 Heng Qi wrote: > The NetDIM library, currently leveraged by an array of NICs, delivers > excellent acceleration benefits. Nevertheless, NICs vary significantly > in their dim profile list prerequisites. > > Specifically, virtio-net backends may present diverse sw

[PATCH] docs: stable-kernel-rules: fix typo sent->send

Change 'sent' to 'send' Signed-off-by: Tim Bird --- Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst index 1704f1c686d0..3178bef6fca3

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] proc: add Kconfigs to restrict /proc/pid/mem access

On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 08:57:50PM +0300, Adrian Ratiu wrote: > Some systems might have difficulty changing their bootloaders > to enable the newly added restrict_proc_mem* params, for e.g. > remote embedded doing OTA updates, so this provides a set of > Kconfigs to set /proc/pid/mem restrictions a

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] proc: restrict /proc/pid/mem access via param knobs

On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 08:57:49PM +0300, Adrian Ratiu wrote: > Prior to v2.6.39 write access to /proc//mem was restricted, > after which it got allowed in commit 198214a7ee50 ("proc: enable > writing to /proc/pid/mem"). Famous last words from that patch: > "no longer a security hazard". :) > > Af

Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] scripts: checkpatch: check unused parameters for function-like macro

Hi Joe, any further comment for this ? May this patch get your reviewed / acked? On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 6:43 AM Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Xining Xu > > If function-like macros do not utilize a parameter, it might result in a > build warning. In our coding style guidelines,