Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] sched: Take cpufreq feedback into account

On 01/30/24 10:35, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 01:50, Qais Yousef wrote: > > > > On 01/30/24 00:26, Qais Yousef wrote: > > > On 01/09/24 17:46, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > > Aggregate the different pressures applied on the capacity of CPUs and > > > > create a new function tha

Re: [PATCH] coding-style: Add guidance to prefer dev_dbg

Abhishek Pandit-Subedi writes: > During review, it was suggested that drivers only emit messages when > something is wrong or it is a debug message. Document this as a formal > recommendation. > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/2024012525-alienate-frown-916b@gregkh/ > > Signed-off-by: Abhishek

Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] sched: Take cpufreq feedback into account

On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 01:50, Qais Yousef wrote: > > On 01/30/24 00:26, Qais Yousef wrote: > > On 01/09/24 17:46, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > Aggregate the different pressures applied on the capacity of CPUs and > > > create a new function that returns the actual capacity of the CPU: > > > get_

Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] arm64: boot: Support Flat Image Tree

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 1:04 AM Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 06:14, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Masahiro, Tom, > > > > On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 07:33, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 11:01:42PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > >