On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 13:30:21 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 01:34:30 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >
> > > I was thinking of a bitmask that represents the handlers, and use that
> > > to map which handler gets called for which shadow entry for a
> > > particular task.
> >
On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 13:30:21 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> What I was thinking was to store a count and the functions to be called:
>
>
> [original_return_address]
> [function_A]
> [function_B]
> [function_C]
> [ 3 ]
>
> Then the trampoline that processes the retur
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 01:34:30 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> > I was thinking of a bitmask that represents the handlers, and use that
> > to map which handler gets called for which shadow entry for a
> > particular task.
>
> Hmm, I doubt that is too complicated and not scalable. I rather like
On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 09:13:41 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 22:00:12 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 12:13:07 -0400
> > Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
>
> > > Because that means if function graph tracer is active, then you can't
> > > do a kretprobe, and
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:27 AM wrote:
>
> >>
> >> On some architectures (e.g. arm64), it's preferable to use MMIO, since
> >> this can be used standalone. Add MMIO support to the pvpanic driver.
> >>
> >
> >0day complains b/c of 1st patch in the series.
> >
> >Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko
> >
> >
On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 09:16:58 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 17:59:32 +1100
> Aleksa Sarai wrote:
>
> > As an aside, I just tested with the frame unwinder and it isn't thrown
> > off-course by kretprobe_trampoline (though obviously the stack is still
> > wrong). So I think we ju
On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 22:00:12 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 12:13:07 -0400
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > Because that means if function graph tracer is active, then you can't
> > do a kretprobe, and vice versa. I'd really like to have it working for
> > multiple users, then
On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 12:13:07 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:43:26 -0500
> Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> > > I'll hopefully have a prototype ready by plumbers.
> >
> > Why do we need multiple users? It would be a lot simpler if we could
> > just enforce a single user per fgra
On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 15:37:33 +1100
Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> On 2018-11-02, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 08:13:43 +1100
> > Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> >
> > > On 2018-11-02, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > > Please split the test case as an independent patch.
> > >
> > > Will do. Shoul
Helen,
Am Samstag, 3. November 2018, 04:53:39 CET schrieb Helen Koike:
> As mentioned in the discussion from the previous version of this patch,
> Android
> and Chrome OS do not use initramfs mostly due to boot time and size liability.
Do you have numbers on that?
I understand that using someth
On 2018-11-02, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > As an aside, I just tested with the frame unwinder and it isn't thrown
> > off-course by kretprobe_trampoline (though obviously the stack is still
> > wrong). So I think we just need to hook into the ORC unwinder to get it
> > to continue skipping up the st
11 matches
Mail list logo
