Hi Mauro,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on lwn/docs-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.15-rc4 next-20171221]
[cannot apply to linus/master]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
h
Hi Mauro,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on lwn/docs-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.15-rc4 next-20171220]
[cannot apply to linus/master]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Shakeel.
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:15:46PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>> > I don't understand how this invariant is useful across different
>> > backing swap devices and availability. e.g. Our OOM decisions are
>> > currently not gre
On Wed, 2017-12-20 at 09:50 -0800, Ram Pai wrote:
> The argument against this patch is -- it should not be baked into
> the ABI as yet, since we do not have clarity on what applications need.
>
> As it stands today the only way to figure out the information from
> userspace is by probing the kern
Hello, Shakeel.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:15:46PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > I don't understand how this invariant is useful across different
> > backing swap devices and availability. e.g. Our OOM decisions are
> > currently not great in that the kernel can easily thrash for a very
> > long
On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 08:21 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:08:00PM -0800, Megha Dey wrote:
> > >
> > > There's work on the way to allow multiple HW PMUs. You'll either have to
> > > wait for that or help in making that happen. What you do not do is
> > > silently hack ar
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello, Shakeel.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 02:39:19PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>>> Suppose a user wants to run multiple instances of a specific job on
>>> different datacenters and s
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Shakeel.
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 02:39:19PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>> Suppose a user wants to run multiple instances of a specific job on
>> different datacenters and s/he has budget of 100MiB for each instance.
>> The instances a
Hello, Shakeel.
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 02:39:19PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> Suppose a user wants to run multiple instances of a specific job on
> different datacenters and s/he has budget of 100MiB for each instance.
> The instances are schduled on the requested datacenters and the
> scheduler
Onewire devices has 6 byte long unique serial numbers, 1 byte family
code and 1 byte CRC. Linux sysfs presents the device folder in the
form of familyID-deviceID, so CRC is not shown. The consequence is
that the device serial number is always a 12 long hex-string, but
doc says 13 in one place. This
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 07:35:37PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 11:20:40 -0600
> Rob Herring wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 04:16:08PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > A new I3C subsystem has been added and a generic description has been
> > > created to represent
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 08:34:56AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 14:28 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > We do not have generic support for something like that on ppc.
> > > The kernel looks at the device tree to determine what hardware features
> > > are available. But
Let's update and clarify he phy documentation, to reflect the latest
changes around the runtime PM deployment in the phy core.
Cc: Jonathan Corbet
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson
---
Documentation/phy.txt | 29 -
1 file changed, 16 insertions
Em Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:47:23 +0200
Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 17:34:46 EET Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:05:46 +0200 Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> > > On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 16:02:02 EET Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 01:33:46AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 15:07 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Sat 2017-11-25 21:29:17, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > Intel(R) SGX is a set of CPU instructions that can be used by
> > > applications to
> > > set aside private regions
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 08:56:03AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:25:41AM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Recently we started a maintainer book (merged into Jonathan's docs-next
> > branch).
> >
> > Would any current maintainers please be willing to e
16 matches
Mail list logo
