[PATCH] i2c: update i2c-dev.h warning in documentation

2017-12-09 Thread Cengiz Can
`dev-interface` document gives examples for accessing i2c from userspace. There's a note warning developers about the different `i2c-dev.h` header files which were shipped with the kernel and i2c-tools separately. However, these commits in i2c-tools repository suggests that the header files are n

[PATCH] i2c: update i2c-dev.h warning in documentation

2017-12-09 Thread Cengiz Can
`dev-interface` document gives examples for accessing i2c from userspace. There's a note warning developers about the different `i2c-dev.h` header files which were shipped with the kernel and i2c-tools separately. However, these commits in i2c-tools repository suggests that the header files are n

Re: [PATCH 2/3] kbuild: prepare to remove C files pre-generated by flex and bison

2017-12-09 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 12/09/2017 08:02 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada > --- > > Documentation/process/changes.rst | 25 + > scripts/Makefile.lib | 20 +--- > 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Docu

[PATCH] Documentation: mono: Update links and s/CVS/Git/

2017-12-09 Thread Jonathan Neuschäfer
The URLs in mono.rst redirect to pages on www.mono-project.com, so let's update them. I took the liberty to update the compilation instructions to the Linux-specific version, because readers of the kernel documentation will most likely use Linux. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer --- Documentat

[PATCH 0/3] kbuild,kconfig: generate lexer/parser C files instead of copying _shipped files

2017-12-09 Thread Masahiro Yamada
In Linux build system convention, pre-generated files are version- controlled with a "_shipped" suffix. During the kernel building, they are simply shipped (copied) removing the suffix. >From users' point of view, this approach can reduce external tool dependency for the kernel build, >From deve

[PATCH 2/3] kbuild: prepare to remove C files pre-generated by flex and bison

2017-12-09 Thread Masahiro Yamada
In Linux build system convention, pre-generated files are version- controlled with a "_shipped" suffix. During the kernel building, they are simply shipped (copied) removing the suffix. This approach can reduce external tool dependency for the kernel build, but it is tedious to manually regenerat

Re: [PATCH] doc: convert printk-formats.txt to rst

2017-12-09 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 06:18:45PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 12:27 +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 01:22:37PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > Outside of the documentation, what could be useful is for > > > someone to add a tool to verify %p exte

Re: [PATCH v2] thinkpad_acpi: Support the battery wear control

2017-12-09 Thread Ognjen Galić
On 09/12/2017, Pavel Machek wrote: > Yeah, what I'm saying is that maybe we need to extend generic power > supply driver. I don't know about that, you would have to ask the maintainers if that is appropriate. Thanks for the time! Ognjen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscrib

Re: [PATCH v2] thinkpad_acpi: Support the battery wear control

2017-12-09 Thread Pavel Machek
On Sat 2017-12-09 11:29:51, Ognjen Galić wrote: > On 09/12/2017, Pavel Machek wrote: > > In newer series (I can't find it at the moment, sorry) > > The new series is a 3-patch patchset that obsoletes this > patch. It is in the testing stage and will be pushed to > the mailing lists and maintainer

Re: [PATCH v2] thinkpad_acpi: Support the battery wear control

2017-12-09 Thread Ognjen Galić
On 09/12/2017, Pavel Machek wrote: > In newer series (I can't find it at the moment, sorry) The new series is a 3-patch patchset that obsoletes this patch. It is in the testing stage and will be pushed to the mailing lists and maintainers in a few days. > Maybe we should have separate status "no

Re: [PATCH v2] thinkpad_acpi: Support the battery wear control

2017-12-09 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! In newer series (I can't find it at the moment, sorry) you return "NOT_CHARGING" status when not charging because of wear control. Maybe we should have separate status "not charging due to wear control"? Thanks, Pavel -