From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Refresh the struct dev_pm_ops kerneldoc comment, so that it looks
better and is more readable after processing by Sphinx, and drop
the kerneldoc marker from a few other comments ("PM_EVENT_ messages"
and a couple of enum types declarations) which are not proper
kerneldoc a
Hi Jon,
This is a new (and hopefully final) iteration of the series of patches starting
the conversion of power management driver API documentation.
Patch [1/3] updates kerneldoc comments in include/linux/pm.h (to make the
documentation generated out of them look better), patch [2/3] converts
Doc
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Move the document describing PM notifiers (used during system sleep
state transitions) to Documentation/driver-api/pm/, convert it to reST
and update it to use current terminology. Also replace the remaining
references to the old version of it in .txt documents with refer
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Move the document describing the system sleep state transitions API
for devices to Documentation/driver-api/pm/, convert it to reST and
update it to use current terminology. Also remove the remaining
reference to the old version of it from pm.h.
The new document still co
On Monday, January 09, 2017 02:34:39 AM Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 02:38:13AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > I sent patches [1-2/3] previosly a couple of weeks ago and there have not
> > been any comments since then, so either they are fine by everybody or the
> > timing was
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:37:50 +
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I'd just use dot -o.
>
> That does make more sense. I looked for such an option before writing
> this, but the manual page doesn't mention it!
Can I get an updated patch from you? Then I'll apply the whole set...
Thanks,
jon
--
T
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:58:15 +0200
Jani Nikula wrote:
> Make targets that don't depend on Sphinx work without warnings about
> missing Sphinx. 'make cleandocs' will work without Sphinx just fine, and
> the targets that are no-ops for Sphinx should just be skipped. Move them
> outside of the HAVE_
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:57:41 +0100
Markus Heiser wrote:
> The cleandocs target won't work if I use a different output folder::
>
> $ make O=/tmp/kernel SPHINXDIRS="process" cleandocs
> make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/kernel'
> make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'clean'. Stop.
> ... D
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:18:05 +0200
Jani Nikula wrote:
> Considering the small amount of python code to compile (assuming sphinx
> itself has .pyc around), the impact on build is neglible.
Hey...don't you know that performance-impacting patches need benchmarks?
Sphinx-only htmldocs build before:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 06:34:01PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 06:22:44PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:59:48PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:49:34PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 06:22:44PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:59:48PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:49:34PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:41:05PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > Maybe
> > > > just select A
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:59:48PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:49:34PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:41:05PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:36:09PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:49:34PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:41:05PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:36:09PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:33:58PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:49:34PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:41:05PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:36:09PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:33:58PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:41:05PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:36:09PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:33:58PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:29:22AM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote:
> > > > On 01/31/2017 12:56 P
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:36:09PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:33:58PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:29:22AM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote:
> > > On 01/31/2017 12:56 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > Given that all ARMv8 CPUs can support
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:33:58PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:29:22AM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote:
> > On 01/31/2017 12:56 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > Given that all ARMv8 CPUs can support SW_PAN, it is more likely to be
> > > enabled than the ARMv8.1 PAN. I'd v
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:43:56AM -0600, eaja...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> From: "Edward A. James"
>
> Add code to tie the hwmon sysfs code and the POWER8 OCC code together, as
> well as probe the entire driver from the I2C bus. I2C is the communication
> method between the BMC and the P8 OCC.
From: Khalid Aziz
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:38:49 -0700
> Thanks for the feedback. This is very helpful. I checked and it indeed
> can cost 50+ cycles even on M7 processor for PSTATE accesses.
Consider how many bytes can be copied in 50+ cycles :-)
>> On etrap, you change ESTATE_PSTATE{1,2} to
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:29:22AM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote:
> On 01/31/2017 12:56 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Given that all ARMv8 CPUs can support SW_PAN, it is more likely to be
> > enabled than the ARMv8.1 PAN. I'd vote for supporting the workaround in
> > that case too, and hope that
On 01/31/2017 12:56 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 31/01/17 17:48, Christopher Covington wrote:
>> On 01/31/2017 07:37 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:52:30AM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote:
The Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies Falkor v1 CPU may allocate TLB entries
>>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 01:33:59AM -0800, Jaghathiswari Rankappagounder
Natarajan wrote:
> This binding provides interface for adding values related to ASPEED
> AST2400/2500 PWM and Fan tach controller support.
> The PWM controller can support upto 8 PWM output ports.
> The Fan tach controller can
- list
Hi Bjorn,
How do you want to handle this series? I'll send one more version of the series
including the directory restructuring in the same series. Should it be based on
your -next?
Cheers
Kishon
On Thursday 12 January 2017 03:55 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> The RFC series that wa
On 31 January 2017 at 23:13, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Hi Emil,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> On 31/01/17 01:48 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> +struct switchtec_ioctl_fw_info {
>>> + __u32 flash_length;
>>> +
>>> + struct {
>>> + __u32 address;
>>> + __u32 le
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
Ich brauche Ihre Unterstützung in Ihrem Land zu verlagern und zu
investieren.Ich bitte Sie um Hilfe, weil ich nicht das Wissen über
Geschäft und die Regeln, die Ihr Land für eine sichere Investition führen.
Werden Sie versprechen, mit mir aufrichtig zu sein?
Bitte
25 matches
Mail list logo
