On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 02:02:24PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:15:17 +0300
> Amir Levy wrote:
>
> > +static LIST_HEAD(controllers_list);
> > +static DECLARE_RWSEM(controllers_list_rwsem);
>
> Why use a semaphore when simple spinlock or mutex would be better?
And nev
On 7/29/2016 2:31 PM, Francis Giraldeau wrote:
I tested this patch on 4.7 and confirm that irq_work does not occurs anymore on
the isolated cpu. Thanks!
Great! Let me know if you'd like me to add your Tested-by in the patch series.
I don't know of any utility to test the task isolation featu
On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:15:19 +0300
Amir Levy wrote:
> + /* pad short packets */
> + if (unlikely(skb->len < ETH_ZLEN)) {
> + int pad_len = ETH_ZLEN - skb->len;
> +
> + /* The skb is freed on error */
> + if (unlik
On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:15:17 +0300
Amir Levy wrote:
> +int nhi_send_message(struct tbt_nhi_ctxt *nhi_ctxt, enum pdf_value pdf,
> + u32 msg_len, const u8 *msg, bool ignore_icm_resp)
> +{
Why not make msg a void * and not have to do so many casts?
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:15:17 +0300
Amir Levy wrote:
> +static LIST_HEAD(controllers_list);
> +static DECLARE_RWSEM(controllers_list_rwsem);
Why use a semaphore when simple spinlock or mutex would be better?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a
I tested this patch on 4.7 and confirm that irq_work does not occurs anymore on
the isolated cpu. Thanks!
I don't know of any utility to test the task isolation feature, so I started
one:
https://github.com/giraldeau/taskisol
The script exp.sh runs the taskisol to test five different conditi
HI Rob,
I got problems following your objections, so it took me some time to
go back to this.
On 21 July 2016 at 22:42, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:06:23AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 20 July 2016 at 03:02, Rob Herring wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:10:45PM +02
