On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 09:03:42AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > I think we should try to have a little fewer nested macros
> > to evaluate here, right now this ends up expanding
> > __pfn_to_phys, PFN_PHYS, PAGE_SHIFT, CONFIG_PAGE_SHIFT,
> > page_to_pfn and __page_to_pfn. While the behavior
On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 02:06:27PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This is clearly a good idea, and I'm happy to take that through
> the asm-generic tree if there are no complaints.
>
> Do you have any other patches that depend on it?
Well, I have new code that would benefit from these helpers, but
Le 09/10/2024 à 13:43, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
page_to_phys is duplicated by all architectures, and from some strange
reason placed in where it doesn't fit at all.
phys_to_page is only provided by a few architectures despite having a lot
of open coded users.
Provide generic versions in
On Wed, Oct 9, 2024, at 11:43, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> page_to_phys is duplicated by all architectures, and from some strange
> reason placed in where it doesn't fit at all.
>
> phys_to_page is only provided by a few architectures despite having a lot
> of open coded users.
>
> Provide generic
page_to_phys is duplicated by all architectures, and from some strange
reason placed in where it doesn't fit at all.
phys_to_page is only provided by a few architectures despite having a lot
of open coded users.
Provide generic versions in to make these
helpers more easily usable.
Signed-off-b
